It is hoped that you had the opportunity to read an article written by my friend, Dave
Temple, regarding the dangers of using your cell phone or PDA while driving, which was published in the March 17-30, 2010,
edition of the Indiana Lawyer. Dave’s article caused me to wonder whether a hands-free device – such
as speakerphone or headset – makes cell phone use safer while driving.
After all, in recent years many states around the country have enacted laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices for
their cellular telephones while operating a vehicle. These laws would lead most of us to believe that the use of hands-free
devices is safer than using your hand to hold a phone while driving. You might be surprised to find that scientific studies
do not support the conclusion that hands-free devices are safer. In fact those studies demonstrate exactly the opposite.
A University of Utah research study demonstrated that “[b]oth handheld and hands-free cell phones impaired driving,
with no significant difference in the degree of impairment. That ‘calls into question driving regulations that prohibited
handheld cell phones and permit hands-free cell phones,’ the researchers write.” The University of Utah News Center,
“Drivers on Cell Phones are as Bad as Drunks” (2006), at www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=062206-1.
The University of Utah study found that “[m]otorists who talk on either handheld or hands-free cell phones drove slightly
slower, were 9 percent slower to hit the brakes, displayed 24 percent more variation in following distance as their attention
switched between driving and conversing, were 19 percent slower to resume normal speed after braking and were more likely
to crash.” In fact, three of the study participants actually rear-ended the pace car. Id.
A white paper released by the National Safety Council in March 2010 entitled “Understanding the Distracted Brain: Why
Driving While Using Hands-free Cell Phones Is Risky Behavior” revealed that driving while talking on a cell phone –
whether a handheld or hands-free device – increases the risk of injury and property crashes fourfold. National Safety
Council, “Understanding the Distracted Brain: Why Driving While Using Hands-Free Cell Phones is Risky Behavior”
(2010), at www.nsc.org/safety_road/Distracted_Driving/Pages/CognitiveDistraction.aspx.
Amazingly, the University of Utah study found that the level of impairment from using a cell phone while driving is the same
as driving with a blood alcohol limit of 0.08 percent. “Drivers on Cell Phones Are as Bad as Drunks.” No responsible
driver would ever get behind the wheel of a car with 0.08 percent blood alcohol content; however, that same driver might think
nothing of jumping into his vehicle and carrying on a conversation on his cell phone.
The evidence is clear that using a cell phone with or without a hands-free device is dangerous. The next time you get into
your vehicle consider turning off your phone before you begin driving and allow your calls go to voicemail; after all, that’s
what voicemail is for.
Tell your friends, family, and clients that you will no longer use the phone or take calls while driving. Talk to your children
and try to explain to them the dangers of using a cell phone while driving. Employers should consider having a written policy
that prohibits employees from using a phone or PDA while driving.
The safest choice is to not use a cell phone while driving. Do not delude yourself into thinking that a hands-free device
is a safer alternative. Help protect yourself and others and turn off your phone the next time you get in your car.•
__________
Jim Hehner is a partner in the Indianapolis firm of Hehner & Associates and is on the board of directors
of DTCI. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.