The next issue of the Indiana Civil Litigation Review will be on members’ desks in a few weeks. Members and
subscribers can anticipate another issue full of valuable information and analyses by leaders of Indiana’s defense bar.
Some of the articles that will appear in this issue include
The Sufficient Rational Basis Test – A “Grand Unified Theory” of Negligent Infliction of Emotional
Distress, Matthew D. Bruno
Worker’s Compensation: Abrogation of Positional Risk Doctrine, Christopher Cross
Outage: Limitations on Use of National Codes and Standards in Actions against Electric Utilities, Thomas J. Jarzyniecki
& Nicholas W. Levi
The Frivolous Claim: Will You Know It When You See It?, Belinda Rose Johnson- Hurtado
Clarian Health v. Wagler: Update, Katherine G. Karres
No Warning … So What? – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Ruling in Kovach v. Caligor Midwest and
Proximate Cause Given the Read-and-Heed Presumption in Failure-to-Warn Cases, Melanie D. Margolin & Lucy R. Dollens
Rescission of Settlement Agreements and “Unsettling” Failures to Disclose Insurance Coverage, Ted W.
Nolting
The Expertise of Medical Experts: Assessing Medical Education and Specialization When Experts Opine Across Specialties,
Kevin C. Rasp
Environmental Insurance Coverage Update, Casey R. Stafford
The Indiana Civil Litigation Review welcomes submissions from DTCI members and others on topics of interest to the
Indiana defense bar. Please write Molly McClellan, managing editor, if you have a topic you would like the board of editors
to consider. MMcClellan@dtci.org.•














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...