ILNews

DTCI: Indiana Civil Litigation Review

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The DTCI’s flagship publication, the Indiana Civil Litigation Review, will be distributed soon. Members and subscribers can anticipate another issue full of valuable information and analyses by leaders of Indiana’s defense bar. The articles that will appear in this issue include:

• Common-Law Indemnity Claims with Design Professional Applications – Geoffrey L. Blazi

• Employment Practices Liability Insurance: The New(er) Kid on the Block – Josh F. Brown & Beth A. Schenberg

• Spoliation of Evidence, an Evolving but Limited Doctrine: When Should the “Destroyer of Evidence” Be Held Accountable? – Stephen E. Arthur & Ashley Arthur Butz

• Product Liability Update – Vanessa A. Davis

• Medical Malpractice Claims under the Indiana Wrongful Death Statutes: Fees, and Expenses, and Loss of Services, Oh My! – Rachel K. Hehner

• Infliction of Emotional Distress – Belinda Johnson-Hurtado

• Retaliation by Association: Third-Party Retaliation Claims Signal the Latest Supreme Court Expansion of Title VII – Trenten D. Klingerman

• An “Unjustified” Conflict in the Law of Tortious Interference with a Contractual Relationship – Phillip D. Olsson

• A Look at Treating Physician Disclosures under Federal Rule 26(a)(2) and Indiana Trial Rule 26(B)(4) – Lesley A. Pfleging

• What Shall We Do with the Drunken Worker? The Intoxication Defense to Worker’s Compensation Claims – Catherine M. Shaw & William A. Ramsey

The Indiana Civil Litigation Review welcomes submissions from DTCI members and others on topics of interest to the Indiana defense bar. Please write Molly Terry, managing editor, at MTerry@dtci.org if you have a topic you would like the board of editors to consider.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. My daughters' kids was removed from the home in March 2015, she has been in total compliance with the requirements of cps, she is going to court on the 4th of August. Cps had called the first team meeting last Monday to inform her that she was not in compliance, by not attending home based therapy, which is done normally with the children in the home, and now they are recommending her to have a psych evaluation, and they are also recommending that the children not be returned to the home. This is all bull hockey. In this so called team meeting which I did attend for the best interest of my child and grandbabies, I learned that no matter how much she does that cps is not trying to return the children and the concerns my daughter has is not important to cps, they only told her that she is to do as they say and not to resist or her rights will be terminated. I cant not believe the way Cps treats people knowing if they threaten you with loosing your kids you will do anything to get them back. My daughter is drug free she has never put her hands on any of her children she does not scream at her babies at all, but she is only allowed to see her kids 6 hours a week and someone has to supervise. Lets all tske a stand against the child protection services. THEY CAN NO LONGER TAKE CHILDREN FROM THERE PARENTS.

  2. Planned Parenthood has the government so trained . . .

  3. In a related story, an undercover video team released this footage of the government's search of the Planned Parenthood facilities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXVN7QJ8m88

  4. Here is an excellent movie for those wanting some historical context, as well as encouragement to stand against dominant political forces and knaves who carry the staves of governance to enforce said dominance: http://www.copperheadthemovie.com/

  5. Not enough copperheads here to care anymore, is my guess. Otherwise, a totally pointless gesture. ... Oh wait: was this done because somebody want to avoid bad press - or was it that some weak kneed officials cravenly fear "protest" violence by "urban youths.."

ADVERTISEMENT