ILNews

DTCI nominations for board of directors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana will elect its 2012 officers and new directors at its 18th Annual Conference and Annual Meeting in French Lick Nov. 17-18, 2011. The officers and directors will take office Jan. 1, 2012.

Lonnie D. Johnson of Clendening Johnson & Bohrer in Bloomington will be installed as the 45th president. The nominations include: Jerry E. Huelat of the Michigan City firm of Huelat Mack & Kreppein to be president-elect; James D. Johnson of the Evansville firm of Rudolph Fine Porter & Johnson to be vice-president; Thomas C. Hays of the Indianapolis firm of Lewis Wagner to be secretary of the association; and James W. Hehner of the Indianapolis firm of Hehner & Associates to be treasurer. Scott M. Kyrouac of the Terre Haute firm of Wilkinson Goeller Modesitt Wilkinson & Drummy will continue on the board as immediate past-president.

Nominated to serve on the board of directors are Marian C. Drenth of the Crown Pointe firm of Johnson & Bell, Renee Mortimer of the Schererville firm of Hinshaw & Culbertson, James P. Strenski of the Indianapolis firm of Cantrell Strenski & Mehringer, and Stacy Forster Thompson of the Bloomington firm of Clendening Johnson & Bohrer.

The officers and directors of the DTCI extend their thanks to the retiring directors: David A. Temple of the Indianapolis firm of Drewry Simmons Vornehm, and Doris Sweetin of the Indianapolis firm of Sweetin Law Group.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  2. My situation was hopeless me and my husband was on the verge of divorce. I was in a awful state and felt that I was not able to cope with life any longer. I found out about this great spell caster drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com and tried him. Well, he did return and now we are doing well again, more than ever before. Thank you so much Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.comi will forever be grateful to you Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com

  3. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  4. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  5. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

ADVERTISEMENT