ILNews

DTCI: North Central Region Trial Academy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

“The Academy is one of those programs that will prepare you for your entire career as a litigator. From the individual attention to the in-depth education to the tips you’ll use for years to come, the North Central Region Trial Academy is a program you won’t want to miss.”

Need to enhance your skills as a litigator? Searching for a good trial advocacy seminar? If so, be sure to register today for the 2014 North Central Region Trial Academy! The academy is the only in-depth trial tactics seminar in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin designed by defense attorneys for defense attorneys.

Academy students will be immersed in the preparation and execution of a successful trial, learning everything from the way to work through motions

in limine and jury instructions, and how to successfully present opening statements, direct and cross-examinations, and closing statements, to the way to incorporate e-discovery into trial preparation.

Who: Lawyers with limited trial experience (Lawyers are grouped according to their level of courtroom experience. Whether you’ve had 10-plus trials or none at all, the North Central Region Trial Academy is right for you.)

What: North Central Region Trial Academy (The only trial tactics program in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin designed for defense counsel.)

Where: Radisson at Star Plaza, Merrillville, Indiana (Just 40 miles from the Chicago Loop!)

When: Thursday, Sept. 11 – Saturday, Sept. 13 (Cocktails & networking are on Thursday evening, then we get down to business on Friday and Saturday!)

Why: Because the North Central Region Trial Academy offers personal attention, a rigorous schedule and an absolutely exceptional education in trial advocacy! (Don’t wait. Space is limited for this program. Register today at www.dtci.org by clicking “Events.”)•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT