ILNews

DTCI: Would you choose to be a lawyer if you had a do-over?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

dtci-mortimer-renee“If you could do it all over again, would you still be a lawyer?” Anyone reading this has probably been asked the question. I myself cannot think of anything else that I would do, and of course, my answer is “Yes!” It is a wonderful profession! My first boss used to come into the office every morning and say, “We are so lucky! We get to practice law today! There is no heavy lifting, we work indoors, and we learn something new every day!”

That said, what we do and what we have is often misperceived. We never really stop thinking about our work. How many times have you been distracted at a party and failed to listen to someone speaking to you because you were thinking about the motion you must argue the next week against a formidable opponent? How many times have you looked at your spouse in the middle of the night and envied his/her sleep because the stress of your case is keeping you awake? How many times have you missed your child’s baseball game or a family outing because you must prepare for an upcoming trial? How many times have you skipped a vacation or left a vacation event to help a client? I have many partners in my firm who seem to have mastered the work-life balance. I am still trying to do so. But as I get older, it gets easier.

This is a crazy time for lawyers. The profession is saturated, and the competition is stiff. Clients are increasing pressure on lawyers to come up with alternative fee strategies. Some clients refuse requests for hourly rate increases. In fact, due to pressures that they are facing, some clients are asking for hourly rate decreases. There seems to be an increase in the number of firm mergers, and practice and specialty groups in law firms demand much work and attention from us as lawyers.

Of course, every profession has its stresses, and no one ever feels sorry for a lawyer. I suppose that any empathy we receive will have to come from our fellow lawyers.

I have to say that, for me, and probably for you, all these stressors are cast aside when I get to participate in true lawyering activities to help my clients. You all know how extremely rewarding it is to prepare a case from the beginning to end and help a client. It is exceedingly fun to cross-examine a witness and get the testimony that you need to win a case. It is an amazing feeling to sit in a courtroom and hear a verdict in your client’s favor, after all the hard work that you have put into a case. Even better, it is great when you win the case that should be won, because it is the right result.

I can write on any topic I choose for this DTCI column. So, I just wanted to tell you all that I think what we do every day is pretty damn cool. Give yourselves a pat on the back for taking on this incredibly difficult, challenging, but rewarding profession. Regardless of what “side of the v.” you are on, what you do is pretty amazing, and we are so lucky! I would absolutely do it all over again! Would you?•

__________

Renee Mortimer is the partner-in-charge of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP’s sole Indiana office and is on the board of directors of DTCI. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  2. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

  3. wow is this a bunch of bs! i know the facts!

  4. MCBA .... time for a new release about your entire membership (or is it just the alter ego) being "saddened and disappointed" in the failure to lynch a police officer protecting himself in the line of duty. But this time against Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "WASHINGTON — Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?ref=us&_r=0

  5. Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

ADVERTISEMENT