ILNews

DTCI: Would you choose to be a lawyer if you had a do-over?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

dtci-mortimer-renee“If you could do it all over again, would you still be a lawyer?” Anyone reading this has probably been asked the question. I myself cannot think of anything else that I would do, and of course, my answer is “Yes!” It is a wonderful profession! My first boss used to come into the office every morning and say, “We are so lucky! We get to practice law today! There is no heavy lifting, we work indoors, and we learn something new every day!”

That said, what we do and what we have is often misperceived. We never really stop thinking about our work. How many times have you been distracted at a party and failed to listen to someone speaking to you because you were thinking about the motion you must argue the next week against a formidable opponent? How many times have you looked at your spouse in the middle of the night and envied his/her sleep because the stress of your case is keeping you awake? How many times have you missed your child’s baseball game or a family outing because you must prepare for an upcoming trial? How many times have you skipped a vacation or left a vacation event to help a client? I have many partners in my firm who seem to have mastered the work-life balance. I am still trying to do so. But as I get older, it gets easier.

This is a crazy time for lawyers. The profession is saturated, and the competition is stiff. Clients are increasing pressure on lawyers to come up with alternative fee strategies. Some clients refuse requests for hourly rate increases. In fact, due to pressures that they are facing, some clients are asking for hourly rate decreases. There seems to be an increase in the number of firm mergers, and practice and specialty groups in law firms demand much work and attention from us as lawyers.

Of course, every profession has its stresses, and no one ever feels sorry for a lawyer. I suppose that any empathy we receive will have to come from our fellow lawyers.

I have to say that, for me, and probably for you, all these stressors are cast aside when I get to participate in true lawyering activities to help my clients. You all know how extremely rewarding it is to prepare a case from the beginning to end and help a client. It is exceedingly fun to cross-examine a witness and get the testimony that you need to win a case. It is an amazing feeling to sit in a courtroom and hear a verdict in your client’s favor, after all the hard work that you have put into a case. Even better, it is great when you win the case that should be won, because it is the right result.

I can write on any topic I choose for this DTCI column. So, I just wanted to tell you all that I think what we do every day is pretty damn cool. Give yourselves a pat on the back for taking on this incredibly difficult, challenging, but rewarding profession. Regardless of what “side of the v.” you are on, what you do is pretty amazing, and we are so lucky! I would absolutely do it all over again! Would you?•

__________

Renee Mortimer is the partner-in-charge of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP’s sole Indiana office and is on the board of directors of DTCI. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

ADVERTISEMENT