ILNews

DTCI's Indiana Civil Litigation Review

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The DTCI’s flagship publication, the Indiana Civil Litigation Review, will be distributed soon. Members and subscribers can anticipate another issue full of valuable information and analyses by leaders of Indiana’s defense bar. The articles that will appear in this issue include:

Wait, What? A Critical Look at the McCabe Trilogy regarding Attorneys’ Fees in Wrongful Death Litigation, by Matthew D. Bruno (Kightlinger & Gray)

Can I Fire Him? by Kristen M. Carroll and Aubrey K. Noltemeyer (Kightlinger & Gray)

The Effect of Social Media on Manufacturers, by Vanessa Davis and Josh Fleming (Frost Brown Todd)

Construction Claim Remedies: Who Are the Classes of Covered Claimants? by Christopher S. Drewry (Drewry Simmons Vornehm)

Searching for Road Signs on Indiana’s “Scope of Employment” Highway, by Neal F. Eggeson Jr. (Eggeson Appellate Services)

Admissibility of Scientific Expert Testimony Twenty Years after Daubert, by R. Daniel Faust (Mallor Grodner)

Case Law Interpreting the “Material Misrepresentation” Provision in Homeowner’s Insurance Policies, by Catherine Haines (Cantrell Strenski & Mehringer)

Competing Duties: The Evolution of Premises Liability Claims in Indiana, by Keith Hays and Elizabeth Trachtman (Hill Fulwider)

Developments and Pitfalls in the Occurrence-Based Statute of Limitations Applicable to Medical Malpractice Claims, by Michele Henderson and Michael Gallo (Stewart & Irwin)

The New Age of the ADA: Understanding and Preparing for the Next Wave of Disability Litigation, by Laurie Kemp (Kightlinger & Gray)

Dealings with Expert Witnesses: a Comparison of the Federal and Indiana Rules Regarding Expert Witness Discovery and Testimony, by Patricia Polis McCrory and Rachel Moore Schafer (Frost Brown Todd)

Effectively Using Workers’ Compensation Liens in Third-Party Litigation, by William A. Ramsey and Catherine M. Hart (Murphy Ice & Koeneman)

The Indiana Civil Litigation Review welcomes submissions from DTCI members and others on topics of interest to the Indiana defense bar. Please write Molly Terry, managing editor, at MTerry@dtci.org if you have a topic you would like the board of editors to consider.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT