The Indiana Supreme Court's electronic ticketing program has won awards from two safety associations.
In July, the high court was honored with the Best Practices Award by the Association of Transportation Safety Information
Professionals for its electronic Citation and Warning System, also known as e-ticket.
The Supreme Court also won the Governors Highway Safety Association Peter K. O'Rourke Special Achievement Award for the
e-ticket system in August.
E-Ticket was created in 2007 by the high court under the direction of the State Court Administration's Judicial Technology
and Automation Committee. It allows law enforcement officers to use a hand-held device to scan a bar code on a driver's
license and registration to quickly create a traffic ticket. That ticket can then be sent electronically to Odyssey - a new
court case-management system - which sends driver conviction and suspension information electronically to the BMV. More than
125 law enforcement agencies in Indiana currently use e-Ticket.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.