A years-long court battle over millions of dollars in East Chicago casino revenue remains alive after a Marion County judge
vacated an earlier dismissal of the civil suit and blocked the release of $8 million in disputed funds that had been part
of a settlement.
Marion Superior Judge David Shaheed on Thursday issued the latest decision in City of East Chicago and State of Indiana
v. East Chicago Second Century Inc., No. 49D01-0504-PL-014394. He agreed with Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller that
approximately $8 million in casino-revenue funds should not be released while the litigation is ongoing. He decided July 15
to set aside his earlier ruling in April that had dismissed the suit, because the city and for-profit organization known as
Second Century didn’t include the AG in settlement negotiations.
The case dates back more than a decade to the administration of now-convicted former Mayor Robert Pastrick, who set up the
casino money and local development agreement with Second Century and similar organizations. But the AG’s office has
tried for years to delve deeper into that financial transaction to determine how that money has been spent once received.
In February, Mayor George Pabey announced he had reached a deal with Second Century, a for-profit economic development organization
that would redirect $1.5 million in annual casino revenue from Second Century to the city. In return, the city would release
its claim to approximately $4 million in payments intended for Second Century that have been delayed since 2005 while the
lawsuit was pending.
But Zoeller objected to the settlement because he claims Second Century has not adequately shown how it has spent some $16
million in casino revenue it has received over the years.
The settlement was approved April 8, but Judge Shaheed's latest ruling stops the settlement from proceeding and permits
the attorney general to participate in the revived lawsuit.
"From the beginning of the Second Century case, the goal of the Indiana attorney general's office has been to ensure
that funds intended to benefit the citizens of East Chicago actually do so," Zoeller said in a statement. "The public
needs assurances that these funds are not squandered or diverted back to political cronies or to an administration under investigation
for corruption."
Pabey was indicted by federal officials in February on charges he conspired to embezzle city money and unlawfully used city
workers for personal projects. His trial is scheduled for September.














Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution