It’s no secret that the state of Indiana is trying to be smarter with its money during this roller-coaster ride sometimes
called the great recession. It’s behaving just like every other state in the union and every citizen of the republic.
Lawyers are no exception; the practice of law ultimately is a business. So you’ll doubtless be familiar with the phrase
“trimming the budget to the bone.”
Well, we believe the state of Indiana has hit bone with a budget cut instituted earlier this month. You can read about the
change regarding victim notification in a story that starts on Page 3 of this issue of the newspaper.
Spending only $375,000 annually on something that the state had spent $1 million a year on sounds like a smart fiscal decision
on paper.
In reality, victims and their lawyers are worried. While it is too early to determine the effectiveness of the Department
of Correction's move to bring victim notifications in house rather than utilizing the previous system, it doesn’t
appear to be off to a smooth start.
Previously, the state had contracted with a company called Appriss, which operated the Indiana Sex and Violent Offender Registry
and Alert Notification Services. The company handled 10,000 monthly automated phone calls to victims who had asked to be notified
of changes in their perpetrator’s status, and processed 2,500 new registrants per month. The former service also could
make automated phone calls and send e-mails in multiple languages.
Now this service is being performed by the DOC through Microsoft’s Information Strategies. Phone calls are being made
by three DOC employees during regular business hours, with support on nights and weekends by other DOC staffers. The DOC stresses
that the service has the potential to be more personal as victims will be able to talk with a real person and ask questions,
which would be a big improvement over an automated call or an e-mail. The DOC can make the phone calls in Spanish and has
access to a translation service for other languages.
But the experiences of lawyers for victims who have registered with the system seeking notification about offenders tell
another story.
One advocate called the DOC after receiving notice of the system change, only to get a message that the line was busy and
to try calling later. The advocate did that and talked to a DOC employee who was “nice and polite” but lacked
information to answer the advocate’s questions.
This lawyer also told our reporter that she has registered against seven offenders in Marion County. She had not received
an immediate notification of their release, even though she was able to confirm on her own they had been released. Another
lawyer who had also registered against an offender got an e-mail notification of the offender’s release, but didn’t
get the requested phone call until three hours later.
This may sound like merely a bumpy start over something that has the potential to save the state $625,000, and that is a
great deal of money, particularly when viewed through the lens of our current economic condition.
But this is truly a life and death situation, and the state is putting a price tag on the lives of victims with this move.
In domestic violence and domestic battery cases, the potential for more bloodshed that could escalate into a lethal situation
is at its highest when the perpetrator is released from jail.
The state must prove right now, not a month or six months from now, that this move will not only result in cost savings,
but in a victim notification system that some of its most vulnerable citizens can depend upon.•














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.