ILNews

Editorial: Home is where the heart is for Mr. Copsey

Editorial Indiana Lawyer
February 2, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Editorial

We often think of law enforcement officers and firefighters as first-responder types who venture into situations where others are reluctant to go.

We’d like to expand the definition of first responder a bit, and bring your attention to an Indianapolis lawyer who after retiring from his day job years ago decided he wasn’t quite done practicing law. He went to work for Indianapolis Legal Aid Society, where he works with elderly residents whose living situations put them at risk of losing their homes. It’s a situation where Orville Copsey Jr. uses his skills as a social worker, which was his first calling, as much as he does his lawyering skills.

At age 79, Mr. Copsey works for ILAS through a grant aimed at keeping elderly residents in their homes. He’s been with ILAS since 1997.
 

Orville Copsey Copsey

Imagine a little bungalow with a fenced-in yard, yet with what looks like the entire contents of the home covering the lawn. The health department has learned that an older person is squatting there – sleeping there at night at least, but it has no running water or electricity, as it was the subject of a tax sale some months back.

It’s not the kind of situation most of us would relish the thought of driving by, never mind stopping in to try and offer assistance.

But this is now Mr. Copsey’s day job, and the world – at least Indianapolis – is a better place because he’s willing to do it.

We surmise he’s so successful at his work because he’s a peer of the people he’s aiming to help. He keeps his car trunk full of cleaning supplies so he can get to work right away, as well as a pet carrier when the homeowner has too many pets to keep safely. He keeps the pet carrier because he can whisk away the animals that are creating a risk for the homeowner more discreetly than can the city’s animal control department.

And instead of showing up at the door dressed as though he were ready to get to work grubbing out the place, he keeps a suit jacket purchased at a second-hand store to wear to initial client meetings. We admire that – he goes into these situations dressed like a lawyer, which has to help the homeowner maintain a sense of dignity.

With his talk of liberating the kitchen and rescuing the sink, it’s easy to tell he enjoys what he does. The “before” photos of one of his cases would tend to point to an unhappy ending, but that turned out to not be the case. This particular homeowner with the liberated kitchen and rescued sink is still at home, nearly four years after becoming one of Mr. Copsey’s clients.

Not all have such good outcomes, but his social work background helps him assess which clients have the physical, mental, and financial ability to keep the home in a state of habitability, and which ones he will need to help find suitable living arrangements.

Mr. Copsey has won the admiration of not only his clients and coworkers at ILAS, but also the people at the Marion County Health Department who assign him cases.

“There are cases where I have no doubt that they could not have been brought to completion but for his involvement,” said MCHD attorney Amy Jones. “It’s who he is, not just where he works. He’s committed to public service and he appreciates and understands the plight of the people he works with.”

And he’s a splendid example of someone with a different definition of the word “retired.” What better way to stay active, engaged in the world, and happy than to find a truly meaningful way to contribute to the world around you.

We want to be like Mr. Copsey when we’re 79.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT