ILNews

Editorial: Home is where the heart is for Mr. Copsey

Editorial Indiana Lawyer
February 2, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Editorial

We often think of law enforcement officers and firefighters as first-responder types who venture into situations where others are reluctant to go.

We’d like to expand the definition of first responder a bit, and bring your attention to an Indianapolis lawyer who after retiring from his day job years ago decided he wasn’t quite done practicing law. He went to work for Indianapolis Legal Aid Society, where he works with elderly residents whose living situations put them at risk of losing their homes. It’s a situation where Orville Copsey Jr. uses his skills as a social worker, which was his first calling, as much as he does his lawyering skills.

At age 79, Mr. Copsey works for ILAS through a grant aimed at keeping elderly residents in their homes. He’s been with ILAS since 1997.
 

Orville Copsey Copsey

Imagine a little bungalow with a fenced-in yard, yet with what looks like the entire contents of the home covering the lawn. The health department has learned that an older person is squatting there – sleeping there at night at least, but it has no running water or electricity, as it was the subject of a tax sale some months back.

It’s not the kind of situation most of us would relish the thought of driving by, never mind stopping in to try and offer assistance.

But this is now Mr. Copsey’s day job, and the world – at least Indianapolis – is a better place because he’s willing to do it.

We surmise he’s so successful at his work because he’s a peer of the people he’s aiming to help. He keeps his car trunk full of cleaning supplies so he can get to work right away, as well as a pet carrier when the homeowner has too many pets to keep safely. He keeps the pet carrier because he can whisk away the animals that are creating a risk for the homeowner more discreetly than can the city’s animal control department.

And instead of showing up at the door dressed as though he were ready to get to work grubbing out the place, he keeps a suit jacket purchased at a second-hand store to wear to initial client meetings. We admire that – he goes into these situations dressed like a lawyer, which has to help the homeowner maintain a sense of dignity.

With his talk of liberating the kitchen and rescuing the sink, it’s easy to tell he enjoys what he does. The “before” photos of one of his cases would tend to point to an unhappy ending, but that turned out to not be the case. This particular homeowner with the liberated kitchen and rescued sink is still at home, nearly four years after becoming one of Mr. Copsey’s clients.

Not all have such good outcomes, but his social work background helps him assess which clients have the physical, mental, and financial ability to keep the home in a state of habitability, and which ones he will need to help find suitable living arrangements.

Mr. Copsey has won the admiration of not only his clients and coworkers at ILAS, but also the people at the Marion County Health Department who assign him cases.

“There are cases where I have no doubt that they could not have been brought to completion but for his involvement,” said MCHD attorney Amy Jones. “It’s who he is, not just where he works. He’s committed to public service and he appreciates and understands the plight of the people he works with.”

And he’s a splendid example of someone with a different definition of the word “retired.” What better way to stay active, engaged in the world, and happy than to find a truly meaningful way to contribute to the world around you.

We want to be like Mr. Copsey when we’re 79.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

ADVERTISEMENT