Those of us on staff here at the newspaper that grew up in Indiana and were of a certain age to pay attention to the news
can likely recall when Judge Sarah Evans Barker was confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
It was a big deal, the first female federal judge here, in an era when few women were in positions of power and authority.
All of a sudden, here was a role model, though she may not have wanted that job. Someone for women who were young at the time
to look to and consider “Well, if she can be a federal judge, then why can’t I ____?” and we filled in our
own blank. She’s an intelligent woman, whose quick wit and easy manner we’d later discover puts people at ease,
and a gifted storyteller.
Fast-forward about 30 years – how could it have taken 30 years? – and then there were two female federal judges
with the addition of the Hon. Theresa Springmann in Indiana’s Northern District. Judge Springmann had been a magistrate
judge in that court before being confirmed as an Article III judge in 2003.
What Judge Barker says in a news story in this issue of the newspaper about the absolutely historic confirmation of Judge
Jane Magnus-Stinson and Judge Tanya Walton Pratt is worth repeating here:
“You may not be able to tell any difference in work product or whether an opinion is written by a man or woman judge,
but this will enhance the quality of justice and makes it deeper and broader and even more credible.”
That’s what bringing diversity to the federal bench will do for all of us.
“Their coming to the court is so special and new, but it’s been a long time coming,” Judge Barker continued
speaking about her new colleagues. “It matters so much that the bench is diverse, and in rapid order we’ve gone
to being a majority on the court after many years of being a distinct minority.”
It also matters more than words can express that the federal bench in Indiana finally has its first African-American judge.
Judge Pratt may now be a member of a majority on the federal bench in the Southern District, but she is still a part of a
distinct minority.
“This has been a test of patience,” Judge Pratt told our reporter, speaking about the nomination process, “but
I’m so very happy and honored. I do respect the historic significance of being the first African-American in the state
to join the federal bench, and that’s really a credit to Sen. (Evan) Bayh for looking outside the traditional group
of candidates to be inclusive.”
One can hardly overstate the importance of having an African-American judge on the federal bench, for the same reason Judge
Barker was such an inspiration for all Indiana women who would take notice of her, even those who would never attend a law
school.
“You have to have those distinguished role models … so you can see others work hard and do it, and know that
you can, too,” Judge Pratt said. She and Judge Magnus-Stinson are of the same mind when they said that one of the best
parts of all this has been to see the pride in their daughters’ eyes over their accomplishments. “Any little girl
can do it.”•














G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.
SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.
Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.
Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.
Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.
This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.