Congratulations to Indiana’s 106th justice, the Honorable Steven David of the Boone Circuit Court.
Judge David brings to the bench a broad diversity of experience that will be a tremendous asset to the Indiana Supreme Court,
and thereby to us all. The son of a career Air Force man, Judge David recently retired from his own military career, having
served in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps. During his military service, he helped reform the treatment
of detainees in Iraq and served as chief defense counsel for Guantanamo Bay detainees.
But there’s more to appreciate about soon-to-be Justice David: He has served as special judge by Supreme Court appointment,
and hearing officer or special master in attorney and judicial misconduct cases. And as juvenile judge in Boone County, Judge
David also has been a vocal advocate for families and on juvenile law. He’s justifiably proud that he’s never
been overturned on appeal in a parental-rights termination case.
But to end our discussion of his appointment to the high court here would overlook the elephant in the room: Half of the
state of Indiana is still waiting for another justice who looks like them.
Women make up half of the bar, half of the state, half of the nation, half of the world, and yet Indiana remains one of two
states in the union without a woman on its court of last resort.
We will repeat here the words we used in our July 7-20 editorial – words from our archives from Supreme Court Justice
Randall T. Shepard: “I have no doubt what the future looks like. The only question is, when will that future roll around?”
The chief justice pondered that in a news story that ran in our newspaper shortly after Justice Robert Rucker was named to
the high court in 1999.
All the women of the state of Indiana, not just the women lawyers and judges, would like to know the answer to that question.
We were intrigued by the observation of Kathy L. Osborn, a partner at Baker & Daniels in Indianapolis, who believes one
factor working against women being appointed to the high court is the fact there has never been a woman lawyer on the Indiana
Judicial Qualifications Commission and Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission.
The bar in Indiana’s district 2 will vote next month on a vacancy that opens at year’s end, when LewisWagner
partner John Trimble’s term ends Dec. 31. Five central Indiana lawyers are in the running.
Osborn and Barnes & Thornburg partner Jan Carroll are two of the five candidates.
Women have served on the commission since it was created in 1970, but all were non-attorneys appointed by the governor. The
current female member, Evansville resident Christine Keck, is director of strategy and business development
for renewable energy at Energy Systems Group in Newburgh. Her term also expires in December.
“The disappointing fact that Indiana only ever has had one female Supreme Court justice, and currently has none, is
an historical one that goes to the cumulative decisions that have been made over nearly two centuries,” Osborn told
our reporter for a news story on Page 3 about the commission election.
She isn’t critical of Judge David’s recent appointment to the high court, but she’s eager to lay the groundwork
for the appointment of women to our high court.
“I am interested in serving on the Judicial Nominating Commission in part because I believe the fact that there has
never been a female attorney on that commission could be one factor of many that has impacted historical nominating and appointment
decisions.”
Perhaps Osborne is onto something.
Regardless, the women of Indiana are still waiting for the future to roll around.•














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.