Editor's Perspective: Indiana Lawyer honors outstanding Hoosier attorneys

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

nelson-jennifer-editorHave you ever met someone and been so impressed by their work, community service and family life, you wonder, “How do they do they have time do to all that?” (And, also, “When do they sleep?”) If not, let me introduce you to 30 people who will undoubtedly impress you — this year’s Leadership in Law Award winners.

Since 2006, Indiana Lawyer has recognized our state’s top-notch attorneys and we continue to be impressed by the caliber of attorneys in Indiana.

We reached out to past honorees and stakeholders in the legal community and asked for nominations, and you delivered. This year, we received the highest number of nominations in the 12-year history of the Leadership in Law Awards, and there were many quality candidates. It was not an easy process to narrow it down to just 30, but we believe you too will be impressed by this year’s honorees. They come from large and midsized firms, legal aid, in-house roles and government service.

These 15 Distinguished Barristers and 15 Up and Coming Lawyers demonstrate leadership, collegiality, intelligence, hard work and humor (and great time-management skills). They set out to make a positive impact at their firms or companies and in the community, and they have succeeded.

For the last several years, we’ve asked our honorees to answer questions to feature in our Leadership in Law supplement (inside this issue) so that readers can learn a little more about the honorees’ thoughts on the profession and their lives outside of the office. There’s been talk in the legal profession for years about diversity, so we asked what can be done to make the profession more diverse. Many agreed that mentoring is key, as well as reaching young adults as early as high school to let them know that law can be a fulfilling career. It’s also imperative for attorneys to have many opportunities to be leaders.

And almost all agreed that while technology is wonderful in letting them respond to clients and handle matters anywhere, at any time — allowing for more time with family or a bit of that coveted work-life balance — it also makes it difficult to ever truly unplug and be off the clock.

The Up and Coming Lawyers pass along great advice they’ve received in their careers — “Be fearless.” “Don’t get too comfortable.” “Know the local (court) rules.”

I always enjoy reading what advice the Distinguished Barristers would give to their younger selves. This year’s class wish they would have had more self-confidence, stayed in contact with more people throughout their career, and bought Apple stock in 1978.

I encourage you to read more about this year’s honorees in the Leadership in Law supplement. I also invite you to join us in honoring them at the Leadership in Law Awards reception May 9 in Indianapolis. More details are available on our website,•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  2. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  3. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  4. Different rules for different folks....

  5. I would strongly suggest anyone seeking mediation check the experience of the mediator. There are retired judges who decide to become mediators. Their training and experience is in making rulings which is not the point of mediation.