ILNews

Elkhart remembers two longtime attorneys

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Attorneys in northern Indiana are remembering two in the legal profession who died within a day of each other, including a longtime public defender who many say was one of the best in the state.
 

zook-brent-mug Zook

Robert Brent Zook, 59, of Goshen died Dec. 30 after suffering from cancer for 14 months. The 1974 graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law began practicing that year in the Elkhart County Public Defender’s Office, earning respect and admiration from the local and state legal community.

Those who worked with Zook through the years say he handled cases of all sizes and had a love and curiosity for the law. He also developed a keen interest in death penalty cases during his career as a public defender. Many describe him as a patient, non-judgmental lawyer who maintained that persona both inside and outside the courtroom, even in the most difficult of circumstances.

Born with cystic fibrosis on Christmas Eve 1951, Zook overwhelmingly exceeded the six-month life expectancy at that time for someone with the disease, as well as the current 37-year life expectancy, and his legal community colleagues say he never used his health as an excuse. He had a double lung transplant in 1996, and Elkhart Circuit Judge Terry Shewmaker – who was a deputy prosecutor at the time – recalls how Zook went to the hospital at night during one trial and then checked himself out to be in court each morning.

The Indiana Public Defender Council in 1999 honored Zook with the Gideon Award, the highest honor a public defender can receive in the state.

“He was a special man and lawyer,” said Don Murphy with the Indiana Public Defender Council. “He beat the odds all of his life, for surviving cystic fibrosis and for effectively representing poor people charged with crimes.”

Zook is survived by his wife, Susan, as well as several step-children and a foster sister. Memorial contributions can be made to the Goshen Amateur Radio Club, of which he was a member.

Though Zook’s death hit the public defender’s office hard, a second death one day later left the Elkhart legal community without another admired attorney. James D. Stevens, 67, died Dec. 31 from pancreatic cancer.

Earning a juris doctor from the University of West Los Angeles, Stevens began practicing in Elkhart in 1977 and had served in the public defender’s office and handled pro bono civil rights cases, including the representation of developmentally disabled individuals. Stevens is survived by his wife, Laura, and their daughters, step-daughters, grandchildren, sisters, and several nieces and nephews.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  2. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  3. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  4. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  5. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

ADVERTISEMENT