ILNews

Establishing Miller Trusts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Sweeping changes to the way Indiana administers Medicaid are expected to save the state millions of dollars, but the transition is causing headaches and putting some recipients at risk of losing benefits.

To help some of the most vulnerable Medicaid beneficiaries – nursing home residents – attorneys are offering their services pro bono to navigate through a financial maneuver that will enable the residents to continue receiving the care they need.

“The state is trying to do this in a way that doesn’t hurt Hoosiers,” said elder law attorney Keith Huffman, “but we’re switching from one complicated system to another complicated system.”

IL EXTRA
To see how Miller trusts work,
click here.

An estimated 3,232 nursing home residents in Indiana will need to obtain a Qualified Income Trust, more commonly known as a Miller Trust, by the end of June to keep their Medicaid coverage. These individuals have personal incomes over the eligibility limit effective June 1 and must divert the excess money into the trusts in order to maintain their benefits.

Nursing home patients who do not have the trusts in place by the deadline will be removed from the Medicaid rolls and will have to reapply for the program by going through the interviews and submitting the paperwork all over again.

Indianapolis attorney Claire Lewis has been coordinating an effort on behalf of the Indiana State Bar Association to enlist lawyers to work with nursing home residents and their families to complete and file the documents that set up the Miller Trusts.

The response to the ISBA’s call for help has been wonderful, Lewis said. She is proud of the way her profession has stepped up and is especially pleased with the association’s Elder Law Section, which has been “absolutely phenomenal in responding.”

Still, her major concern is that some nursing home residents will not get the assistance they need and will lose their Medicaid benefits. She said she has been living and breathing Miller Trusts for the past couple of months and very good people at the state are working long, ridiculous hours to ensure no one slips through the cracks but, she noted, “I think transitions are always difficult.”

Stopping the spend down

As part of Indiana’s change in Medicaid administration, the state will not have to operate the spend-down program, which has been described as expensive, inefficient and a nightmare.

Individuals whose incomes are higher than roughly 75 percent of federal poverty level are currently being shifted into the spend-down program. This program functions like a monthly deductible. If a recipient does not incur enough medical expenses, Medicaid will not kick-in and pay for services that month.

With Medicaid coverage fluctuating month to month, sometimes patients have had their medical care interrupted and other times providers have had difficulty collecting payments from patients.

lewis-claire.jpg Lewis

Indiana predicts it will save $35.7 million annually starting in fiscal year 2015 by ending the spend-down program.

The transition is possible partly because of the Affordable Care Act. Prior to the federal health care exchange, low-income individuals who did not qualify for Medicare had no other option than to enroll in the spend-down program. Now, according to the state, the federal marketplace enables eligible individuals to receive “affordable comprehensive coverage” without having to spend a certain amount each month to ensure continuous coverage.

As a result of the end of the spend-down program, nursing home residents with personal monthly incomes higher than $2,163 will have to establish a Miller Trust. The amount over the limit will be essentially hidden in the trust so the person can qualify for Medicaid. Then the funds will be withdrawn and used to help pay for the nursing home costs.

“I really describe it to clients as they just got to jump through hoops,” said Dennis Frick, director of the Senior Law Project at Indiana Legal Services Inc. “It does seem silly. It’s done just because of the way the federal law is written.”

Preventing loss of benefits

The staff at TLC Management, a company that operates several nursing facilities in Indiana, decided to handle all the details of setting up the trust accounts for their residents.

“They’re sick, and they’re old, and they don’t need to deal with that,” said Alma McKibben, regional field accountant and Medicaid specialist for TLC. “We feel if we can alleviate any of the stress for our residents we’re going to do that.”

She explained some of the residents do not have family who can help them wade through the Miller Trust paperwork, and others have family but they cannot provide assistance. Many residents became worried they would lose their benefits after receiving letters from the state describing the change in how Medicaid benefits are handled.

TLC welcomed the volunteer attorneys into the process to create the trusts. McKibben said the lawyers have been “extremely helpful across the board,” and many residents are comforted by knowing an attorney is assisting them.

Huffman, an attorney at Dale Huffman & Babcock in Bluffton and chair of the ISBA Elder Law Section, is among the attorneys helping TLC residents. To date, he said his practice has completed more than 100 trusts.

However, Huffman and other attorneys say they are concerned about the backlog at the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration and they are frustrated by the resistance from some banks.

frick-dennis.jpg Frick

Paperwork is being submitted to the state, showing the trusts are set up. A pending verification may then be issued but, attorneys have noted, instead of giving approval, the state has come back and asked for information already provided in some cases.

The lag by the state is raising fears that nursing home residents will have their benefits terminated even though they turned in all the documents by the deadline.

FSSA did not provide exact numbers but said “several hundred trust documents” have been received and are at various stages of the approval process. And changes are being made to expedite the approval process. The FSSA is continuing to reach out to all parties involved in setting up the trusts.

Aside from the problems at the state, attorneys are also dealing with a “great deal of confusion among the banks,” Huffman said.

Attorneys are trying to persuade the banks to not tack on fees and service charges to the Miller Trusts because those fees would come out of the resident’s monthly allowance. Some financial institutions maintain family members who have been legally designated to handle a nursing home resident’s affairs cannot sign the trust account documents because the power of attorney does not give specific authority to do so.

Some attorneys pointed to Regions Bank, in particular, as not handling Miller Trusts. The institution confirmed it does not establish these trusts but did not provide any explanation for its policy.

McKibben pushed back after one bank that TLC had been doing business with for 20 years turned down the Miller Trusts. After she demanded to know why and reiterated the trusts are needed in order to maintain eligibility, the institution relented.

With the deadline approaching, Huffman anticipates 90 percent of nursing home residents who need Miller Trusts will have established them in time. Frick is equally optimistic, saying some may have coverage terminated but, hopefully, the number will be small and the situation will be resolved quickly.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT