ILNews

Evansville Bar Association to celebrate 100th anniversary

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

In 1871, Ben Sawyer was executed in a jail courtyard, after being tried and convicted for the murder of his wife. Sawyer was the second – and last – criminal to be publicly executed in Vanderburgh County. Sawyer’s story is one of many that historian Bill Bartelt uncovered while researching the history of Vanderburgh County law for the Evansville Bar Association.
 

Randall Shepard Shepard

The EBA commissioned Bartelt to research the county’s legal history for several projects that will be unveiled at the bar association’s 100th anniversary celebration later this month. The two-day event will kickoff at 8 a.m. April 28, when more than 250 students from Evansville-area high schools will participate in “mock trial” day. Since 1933, the EBA has scheduled this day for students to act as attorneys, witnesses, and juries. Real judges and magistrates sit on the bench for the mock trials.

eba At its anniversary celebration, the Evansville Bar Association will reveal to the public the Randall T. Shepard courtroom, shown here during remodeling. The Old Courthouse Foundation worked with the architect during renovation to ensure historic accuracy. (Submitted photo)

The mock trial day was where current Indiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard first played the role of attorney.

“I would have done this, I think, in the winter or spring of 1965. That seems like a hundred years ago,” Chief Justice Shepard said. “As I remember, the case involved a chicken farmer arrested and charged with drunk driving.”

Shepard remembers losing that case to Charles Berger, who also went on to become an attorney and has a practice in Evansville.

Then 18, Shepard hadn’t decided what career he wanted to pursue, but he had considered law as a vocation. He said the mock trial was “certainly a factor” in his decision to become a lawyer.

On April 29, Shepard will make remarks at an evening reception at the Old Vanderburgh County Courthouse. The EBA will debut the remodeled Superior courtroom, which has been renamed the Randall T. Shepard Courtroom.

Dan Carwile Carwile

“I learned the most important skills and values of law from Evansville lawyers in the course of being a part of that legal community,” Shepard said. “Although I have been away for a long time, I still treasure what those lawyers and judges taught me. So the thoughtfulness (of naming the courtroom in his honor) is very heartwarming.”

Adjacent to the courtroom is the new Vanderburgh County Legal History Center, which will feature an 18-foot-tall timeline Bartelt created that begins in 1818. Video kiosks will air segments produced by students in Reitz High School’s “Feel the History” course.

Indiana Lawyer Online EXTRA
For a timeline on the history of the Evansville Bar Association, click here.

The EBA met last year with Reitz teacher Jeremy Villines and Feel the History course co-creators Jon Carl and Jerry Hughes to discuss the student video project. Hughes said the bar association asked if the class could produce historical videos for its 100th anniversary, remembering that the class had previously filmed a segment about the old courthouse. (That segment can be viewed on the Feel the History website: www.feelthehistory.com.)

Bartelt provided the preliminary background material for the student videos. “But the kids took it further,” Hughes said, by conducting additional research on the topics they chose for the videos.

vollmer Vollmer

For one video, students chose subject Leslie “Mad Dog” Irvin, a man who was sentenced to death for killing six people in the tri-state area in the 1950s. The U.S. Supreme Court later overturned Irvin’s death sentence, ruling in its decision on Irvin v. Dowd 359 U.S. 394 (1959) that Irvin had not received a fair trial, due to the effect of pre-trial publicity.

Hughes said that in addition to being a permanent fixture in the old courthouse, the videos will air later this year on local Public Broadcasting affiliate WNIN. Students will offer a sneak preview of their work at a luncheon on April 28.

The planning for the anniversary celebration began three years ago, when past EBA President Dan Carwile assembled and chaired the committee to raise the nearly $300,000 needed for the restoration of the old courthouse. Current EBA President Krista Lockyear and Judge Carl Heldt worked closely with The Old Courthouse Foundation and the architect working on the project to make sure the building would be both functional and historically accurate.

EBA Executive Director Susan Vollmer said attorneys Todd Glass and Doug Briody spent hundreds of hours sifting through Bartelt’s research to create a display for the history center.

Cost to attend the reception on April 29 is $55, and attendees must register in advance by contacting Cathy Martin at cathy@evvbar.org or (812) 426-1712.•


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.

  2. SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.

    Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
    Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
    Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
    It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.

  3. Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
    As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
    This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.

  4. Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.

  5. This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

ADVERTISEMENT