Human rights violations and amnesty are the focus of a Valparaiso University School of Law event next week.
Visiting assistant professor of law at Marquette University Law School Lisa J. Laplante will discuss the tension in international
human rights law and international criminal law with respect to amnesties. She'll address the issue through the Barrios
Altos case, a decision issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2001 that declared unlawful Peru's amnesty
laws promulgated in 1995.
Laplante draws on her experiences in Peru to show that international law directly impacts national transitional justice experiences,
and argues criminal justice should be carried out rather than granting amnesty.
Until recently, in countries seeking to address past episodes of systematic human rights violations, amnesties were considered
an acceptable means of promoting transitional justice, which meant human rights perpetrators went unpunished. In response,
truth commissions became a popular alternative to criminal trials. International criminal law lawyers questioned the legality
of the resulting amnesties and eventually carved out exceptions for certain international crimes. This discourse suggests
it's still possible for nations to resort to amnesties for serious human rights violations during political transitions,
and thus impunity.
The event, "Outlawing Amnesty," is from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. CST Nov. 9 in the Ulbricht Classroom in the law school.
It's free and open to the public.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.