ILNews

Event to discuss voting issues

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies student chapter at Indiana University Maurer School of Law - Bloomington is hosting an event Monday to discuss developments in election law since Crawford v. Marion County Election Board.

Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission and senior legal fellow at Heritage Foundation's Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, and Maurer School of Law professor Luis Fuentes-Rohwer will be on hand to discuss issues in election law. Those issues include the "Hillary, the Movie!" case under consideration in the Supreme Court of the United States; the voter ID case, Crawford; voter fraud allegations against ACORN; voter intimidation, and other topics.

The discussion begins at noon in the law school. Armen Boyajian, president of the Federalist Society student chapter, said the location is yet to be determined, but there will be signs when you walk in the front door of the law school directing people to the event. The discussion is open to the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  2. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  3. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  4. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

  5. Baer filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit on April 30 2015. When will this be decided? How many more appeals does this guy have? Unbelievable this is dragging on like this.

ADVERTISEMENT