University of Notre Dame Law School professor Richard Garnett is the featured speaker at an event discussing the upcoming
presidential election and its impact on the nation's highest court. "The Presidential Election and the Future of
the Supreme Court," is presented by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies Indianapolis Lawyers Division
Chapter.
The discussion is at noon Sept. 25 at the Conrad Hotel Indianapolis, 2nd Floor, Hong Kong Room, 50 W. Washington
St., Indianapolis. The event is $20 for members, students, and government employees, and $25 for non-members. Payment will
be accepted at the door.
There is 1 hour of continuing legal education credit available pending approval. Contact Janice Simmons at Taft Stettinius
& Hollister at (317) 713-3488 or jsimmons@taftlaw.com to RSVP for the event.
ILNews
Event to focus on election, U.S. Supreme Court
IL Staff
September 23, 2008
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
-
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
-
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
-
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
-
Wow, just wow.
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Conversations
0 Comments
Add Comment