ILNews

Ex-college football players sue NCAA, helmet makers on concussion claims

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two former University of Washington football players are seeking class-action certification for brain-injury claims against the NCAA and helmet makers, including Riddell Inc.and All-Sports Corp.

Former Huskies quarterback John DuRocher and safety Darrin Harris are the lead plaintiffs in a complaint filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in Indianapolis. The suit seeks to certify a class of former NCAA football players who suffered concussions that led to long-term injuries from chronic headaches to Alzheimer’s disease.

"We have not been served with this Complaint," said Stacey Osburn, NCAA director of public and media relations. "We have reviewed a copy and it appears to use language and raise issues similar to the prior potential class action complaints filed. It is not unusual to see competing class action-styled complaints filed as plaintiff's attorneys try to secure a lead position in consolidated litigation.  Like the other potential class action complaints filed by other plaintiffs' lawyers, we find allegations against the NCAA to be misleading and erroneous."

The complaint claims defendants were negligent because they knew of the risks of traumatic brain injury resulting from concussions and failed to protect or educate athletes or take steps that would have reduced the risks. Former student athletes seek damages including costs of ongoing medical care and monitoring.

DuRocher and Harris are represented by attorneys from Indianapolis-based Cohen & Malad LLP along with the Dugan Law Firm APLC, Barrett Law Group PA and Douglas H. Gill & Associates.

The suit is the second federal head-injury claim brought against the NCAA by a former football player. Former Eastern Illinois player Adrian Arrington sued in the Northern District of Illinois over repeated concussions. A status hearing in that case is scheduled for Oct. 24.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I'm not sure what's more depressing: the fact that people would pay $35,000 per year to attend an unaccredited law school, or the fact that the same people "are hanging in there and willing to follow the dean’s lead in going forward" after the same school fails to gain accreditation, rendering their $70,000 and counting education worthless. Maybe it's a good thing these people can't sit for the bar.

  2. Such is not uncommon on law school startups. Students and faculty should tap Bruce Green, city attorney of Lufkin, Texas. He led a group of studnets and faculty and sued the ABA as a law student. He knows the ropes, has advised other law school startups. Very astute and principled attorney of unpopular clients, at least in his past, before Lufkin tapped him to run their show.

  3. Not that having the appellate records on Odyssey won't be welcome or useful, but I would rather they first bring in the stray counties that aren't yet connected on the trial court level.

  4. Aristotle said 350 bc: "The most hated sort, and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest. And this term interest, which means the birth of money from money, is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent. Wherefore of an modes of getting wealth this is the most unnatural.

  5. Oh yes, lifetime tenure. The Founders gave that to the federal judges .... at that time no federal district courts existed .... so we are talking the Supreme Court justices only in context ....so that they could rule against traditional marriage and for the other pet projects of the sixties generation. Right. Hmmmm, but I must admit, there is something from that time frame that seems to recommend itself in this context ..... on yes, from a document the Founders penned in 1776: " He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good."

ADVERTISEMENT