ILNews

Ex-college football players sue NCAA, helmet makers on concussion claims

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two former University of Washington football players are seeking class-action certification for brain-injury claims against the NCAA and helmet makers, including Riddell Inc.and All-Sports Corp.

Former Huskies quarterback John DuRocher and safety Darrin Harris are the lead plaintiffs in a complaint filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in Indianapolis. The suit seeks to certify a class of former NCAA football players who suffered concussions that led to long-term injuries from chronic headaches to Alzheimer’s disease.

"We have not been served with this Complaint," said Stacey Osburn, NCAA director of public and media relations. "We have reviewed a copy and it appears to use language and raise issues similar to the prior potential class action complaints filed. It is not unusual to see competing class action-styled complaints filed as plaintiff's attorneys try to secure a lead position in consolidated litigation.  Like the other potential class action complaints filed by other plaintiffs' lawyers, we find allegations against the NCAA to be misleading and erroneous."

The complaint claims defendants were negligent because they knew of the risks of traumatic brain injury resulting from concussions and failed to protect or educate athletes or take steps that would have reduced the risks. Former student athletes seek damages including costs of ongoing medical care and monitoring.

DuRocher and Harris are represented by attorneys from Indianapolis-based Cohen & Malad LLP along with the Dugan Law Firm APLC, Barrett Law Group PA and Douglas H. Gill & Associates.

The suit is the second federal head-injury claim brought against the NCAA by a former football player. Former Eastern Illinois player Adrian Arrington sued in the Northern District of Illinois over repeated concussions. A status hearing in that case is scheduled for Oct. 24.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT