ILNews

Ex-Marion County court workers charged in ticket-fixing scheme

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two former Marion County traffic court bailiffs have been charged with dozens of felonies in a ticket-fixing scandal, Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry announced Thursday.

Evelyn Hughes and Carnetta Arthur were arrested Wednesday as a result of a report made by Marion Superior Courts to the prosecutor’s grand jury division.  Hughes was charged with 49 counts, including bribery as Level 5 and Class C felonies, forgery as Level 6 and Class C felonies, and official misconduct as Level 6 or Class D felonies. Arthur faces 14 counts, including Level 6 or Class C felony forgery and Level 6 or Class D felony official misconduct.

Marion Superior Court administrator Emily VanOsdol said in a statement the court could not comment on pending legal matters and noted Arthur and Hughes were no longer employed by the courts.

Hughes is accused of taking cash to make several infraction or ordinance violation cases go away in Marion Superior Traffic Court from early 2012 through March 2015. She is accused of forging the signatures of former Traffic Court Judges William Young, James Joven or current Traffic Court Judge Marcel Pratt, or imputing computer codes to dismiss cases or vacate those judges’ rulings.

The charges against Arthur are similar, though there are no charges that she accepted bribes to fix traffic court cases.

A special judge will be appointed in the cases because of the defendants’ former employment with Marion Superior Courts. According to online court records, 10 protective orders have been issued in the case against Hughes and six against Arthur. Initial hearings for both defendants are set for Thursday afternoon.   

According to a detective’s probable cause affidavit, Hughes was terminated from traffic court in March 2015. The affidavit alleges witnesses said they gave acquaintances sums of $180 to $429 to provide to Hughes, who then vacated judgments or dismissed cases. The affidavit said Arthur also vacated several unpaid judgments, including four of Hughes’ traffic court cases.

The bailiffs also are accused of approving insurance waivers and dismissing cases for motorists who in some cases had their licenses suspended by the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, according to the affidavit.

“During their time as bailiffs, they used their positions to forge judge’s signatures on documents, dismissed cases they were not authorized to dismiss, altered court records they were not authorized to alter, removed fees owed to Marion County/City of Indianapolis  without authorization, and forwarded forged court documents to the Indiana BMV to clear driving records of suspensions and/or reinstatement/insurance fees without authorization, knowing the Indiana BMV would rely on such documents,” the probable cause affidavit says.

The prosecutor’s office noted that in a separate and unrelated case, a former bailiff at the Arrestee Processing Center of the Marion County Jail is accused of accessing law enforcement databases for personal use without proper authority or permission. Crystal Jones was charged December 29 with seven counts of official misconduct as Level 6 and Class D felonies and two misdemeanor counts of computer trespass.

According to the prosecutor’s office, Jones is accused of accessing information from multiple law enforcement databases for nonofficial reasons without permission or consent in the performance of her official duties, and providing that information to defendants. Jones is also accused of using her official access to complete a bail interview without permission or consent in which she knew the defendant and provided false information knowing that information would be considered by a judge for determination of a bond.

Hancock Superior Judge Dan E. Marshall has been appointed to hear Jones’ case due to her prior employment with Marion County Superior Court.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Corruption abounds
    Think about the unstated story here ... "Hughes is accused of taking cash to make several infraction or ordinance violation cases go away in Marion Superior Traffic Court from early 2012 through March 2015." OK, so the SOL is likely why the counts stop at 2012. Great question for the media .... how long had this corruption, systemic in scope, been going on undetected by the powers that be? NO ONE knew? Very difficult to believe that given the scope of the wrongdoing: “During their time as bailiffs, they used their positions to forge judge’s signatures on documents, dismissed cases they were not authorized to dismiss, altered court records they were not authorized to alter, removed fees owed to Marion County/City of Indianapolis without authorization, and forwarded forged court documents to the Indiana BMV to clear driving records of suspensions and/or reinstatement/insurance fees without authorization" YET NO JUDICAL OFFICER KNEW? Add to all of that this: "accessing information from multiple law enforcement databases for nonofficial reasons without permission or consent in the performance of her official duties, and providing that information to defendants. Jones is also accused of using her official access to complete a bail interview without permission or consent in which she knew the defendant and provided false information knowing that information would be considered by a judge for determination of a bond." AND NO LAW ENFORCEMENT MANAGERS KNEW? Who knew and kept silent during the long years this was taking place? Journalists ... even wonder where whistleblowers are when you most need them Indianapolis? Lesson: If your governments are allowed to persecute and destroy whistleblowers, as Indiana does, well then they are not around when you need them. And thus corruption abounds ... and when the journalist pay no nevermind .... corruption really, really abounds.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Affordable Loan Offer (ericloanfinance@hotmail.com) NEED A LOAN?Sometime i really wanna help those in a financial problems.i was wondering why some people talks about inability to get a loan from a bank/company. have you guys ever try Eric Benson lending service.it cost dollars to loan from their company. my aunty from USA,just got a home loan from Eric Benson Lending banking card service.and they gave her a loan of 8,000,000 USD. they give out loan from 100,000 USD - 100,000,000 USD. try it yourself and testimony. have a great day as you try.Kiss & Hug. Contact E-mail: ericloanfinance@hotmail.com

  2. From the article's fourth paragraph: "Her work underscores the blurry lines in Russia between the government and businesses . . ." Obviously, the author of this piece doesn't pay much attention to the "blurry lines" between government and businesses that exist in the United States. And I'm not talking only about Trump's alleged conflicts of interest. When lobbyists for major industries (pharmaceutical, petroleum, insurance, etc) have greater access to this country's elected representatives than do everyday individuals (i.e., voters), then I would say that the lines between government and business in the United States are just as blurry, if not more so, than in Russia.

  3. For some strange reason this story, like many on this ezine that question the powerful, seems to have been released in two formats. Prior format here: http://www.theindianalawyer.com/nominees-selected-for-us-attorney-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/44263 That observed, I must note that it is quite refreshing that denizens of the great unwashed (like me) can be allowed to openly question powerful elitists at ICE MILLER who are on the public dole like Selby. Kudos to those at this ezine who understand that they cannot be mere lapdogs to the powerful and corrupt, lest freedom bleed out. If you wonder why the Senator resisted Selby, consider reading the comments here for a theory: http://www.theindianalawyer.com/nominees-selected-for-us-attorney-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/44263

  4. Why is it a crisis that people want to protect their rights themselves? The courts have a huge bias against people appearing on their own behalf and these judges and lawyers will face their maker one day and answer for their actions.

  5. State's rights, civil rights and human rights are all in jeopardy with Trump in the WH and Sessions running Justice.

ADVERTISEMENT