Juan Roberto Melendez-Colon, who spent more than 17 years on Florida's death row before his exoneration, will speak about
his experience Jan. 12 at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis. A documentary about his time on death row will
also be shown.
Melendez-Colon will speak at 12:30 p.m. in the Conour Atrium at the law school. The documentary about his time on death row,
"Juan Melendez 6446," will be shown at 4:30 p.m., also in the atrium. The event is free and open to the public.
Melendez-Colon is the 99th death row inmate in the country to be exonerated since 1973. He was released from prison in 2002
after it came to light that the real killer had confessed to the crime and told at least 16 people that Melendez-Colon wasn't
involved. A judge reversed his conviction and ordered a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and the state declined
to pursue a new trial because it no longer had any evidence to support a conviction. Previously, Melendez-Colon's conviction
and death sentence were upheld on appeal three times by the Florida Supreme Court.
Since his release, Melendez-Colon has traveled throughout the U.S., Canada, and Europe sharing his story. He's a board
member on the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and Witness to Innocence, a steering committee member of the
New Mexico Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty, and an international spokesperson for the Association in Defense of the
Wrongfully Convicted.
Also attending will be Melendez-Colon's lawyer, Judi Caruso, a criminal defense attorney and human rights activist originally
from Ireland. She is also director of the Juan Melendez Voices United for Justice.
The event is sponsored by the IU School of Law - Indianapolis' Students Against Capital Punishment.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.