Eye on the Profession: Attorneys, change is here but you will eventually like it

John Trimble
June 14, 2017
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

TrimbleI was at a bar association meeting within the last week that had a cross-section of lawyers of all ages and practice areas. There was one overriding theme of the conversations among the lawyers in attendance: They were hating change.

Within the last year, Indiana lawyers and our state judicial system have been dragged kicking and screaming into the mainstream of U.S. practice. We now have a pilot project that has brought commercial courts and commercial court rules to Indiana lawyers and their clients, and we have e-filing in many of our counties and in our appellate system.

For lawyers who have practiced regularly in federal court, these changes are welcomed. E-filing was originally met with pushback and angst in the federal system, but once we got used to it, we loved it. Case management plans and firm deadlines have also long been part of the federal system, and federal practitioners know that a case is not going to sit untouched and undecided very long. Until now, the majority of Indiana trial attorneys could avoid e-filing and more vigorous case management by staying out of federal court. In general, that is no longer the case, and all of us are going to have to adapt or be left behind.

The commercial court pilot project is up and running, and most accounts of the project have been very positive. Cases are moving faster and with greater judicial oversight than most civil cases have been able to receive in the past. The rules that require case management plans have been largely self-executing, and parties have benefited from the relative certainty of knowing when specific things will occur. More importantly, cases that must be moved more rapidly such as employment disputes, non-compete violation claims, unfair business practice claims, and trade secret violations have been handled with greater dispatch.

There remain some misconceptions about the commercial court rules. For example, no one is forced to stay in the commercial court pilot project. Opt-out rules allow unwilling litigants to object to being in commercial court, and with a timely objection, a case will return to the regular plenary civil docket. Smaller businesses and individuals have protection from being bowled over by heavy-handed bullying behavior of a better-financed opponent because commercial court judges understand and can apply proportionality to the litigation.

It has been argued that the commercial courts are somehow “secret” in their practices, or that commercial courts have a different set of rules for applying injunctive relief. However, that is simply not true. While the rules may require greater attention to case management, there are no meaningful differences between the standard trial rules and the commercial rules when it comes to protecting the rights of litigants as we have always known them.

In summary, lawyers who represent businesses and the management, and employees of businesses should embrace commercial courts. Your clients will get good and economical case management and prompter, less expensive outcomes. Does that mean that you will always prevail? Of course not, but there is no cause to believe that commercial courts are a place to fear. They simply are not, and I urge you to try them.

E-filing is a slightly different matter. There are still kinks in the system. County filing practices vary widely, and the choice of vendors can cause head spinning. Some counties have not yet adopted e-filing, and some lawyers have not yet taken the steps to sign up to participate. In addition, for busy lawyers, the press of additional email can be crushing.

Despite the bugs in the system, e-filing is going to be wonderful. We are all going to save money on postage, envelopes and filing of paper. Access to newly filed pleadings is scary fast. Trips to the courthouse to file things will be unnecessary, and lawyers will have more time to work on productive business. Lawyers, their clients and the public will eventually have far easier access to court filings and orders.

I have a confession. I understand why some lawyers are worried right now about e-filing.

I have not yet personally learned how to do it. More seasoned lawyers who are less techie, like me, are going to be afraid of this for a while. I have the good fortune of having capable people to file for me, but not everyone has that assistance. However, we are all (including me) going to have to learn how to e-file. We have no choice. It is here to stay.

Commercial courts and e-filing are just two of the many changes we are facing. Keep an open mind. Adapt. Try it. Embrace it. Before long, you will see that all of these changes are good and that practicing law will be easier with these innovations, not more difficult. #WillYouBeThere?•


John C. Trimble (@indytrims) is a senior partner at the Indianapolis firm of Lewis Wagner LLP. He is a self-described bar association “junkie” who admits that he spends an inordinate amount of time on law practice management, judicial independence and legal profession issues. The opinions expressed are those of the author.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The voices of the prophets are more on blogs than subway walls these days, Dawn. Here is the voice of one calling out in the wilderness ... against a corrupted judiciary ... that remains corrupt a decade and a half later ... due to, so sadly, the acquiescence of good judges unwilling to shake the forest ... for fear that is not faith ..

  2. So I purchased a vehicle cash from the lot on West Washington in Feb 2017. Since then I found it the vehicle had been declared a total loss and had sat in a salvage yard due to fire. My title does not show any of that. I also have had to put thousands of dollars into repairs because it was not a solid vehicle like they stated. I need to find out how to contact the lawyers on this lawsuit.

  3. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  4. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  5. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.