February bar exam results may indicate ‘new normal’

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The February 2017 bar exam results brought a fresh round of disappointment to the Indiana legal community and a renewed conversation about why the scores keep dropping.

Overall, the pass rate plunged to 48 percent for the February 2017 exam, the lowest since at least 2002, the last year that bar exam statistics are available on the Indiana Board of Law Examiners’ website. A total of 263 individuals took the test in February with 62 percent of first-time takers passing and only 37 percent of the repeat takers being successful.

sullivan-frank-no-robe Sulllivan

Former Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan speculated this may be the new normal. Applicants today need to be prepared to take the bar exam more than once.

As an example, he pointed to the Class of 2016 from Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, where he is now a professor. The overall pass rate for the July exam was 70 percent, but that rose to about 82 percent when the unsuccessful class members retook the exam this February.

failure-sidebar-chart.gifNationally, conventional wisdom holds that the increasing number of failing scores is correlated to the quality of students being admitted to law schools. As higher-qualified students decide not to pursue a J.D. because of the struggling job market in the legal profession, law schools are having to dip lower into the applicant pool to maintain their class sizes. Students with lower grade point averages and LSAT scores who would have been denied admittance 10 years ago are now being accepted.

However, Sullivan is not convinced. A professor at IU McKinney for the past five years, he has not noticed any decline in the quality of his students. He has seen no difference in the ability of the students or their level of preparation during his tenure in the classroom.

“I think the bar admissions either made the exam harder or are grading it harder,” he said.

Questions about the bar exam itself are not new.

Cynthia Gillard, attorney at Warrick & Boyn LLP in Elkhart, wondered if the Multistate Bar Exam could be tripping up many test takers. She was a member of the Indiana Bar Examination Assessment Task Force that evaluated the state’s bar exam and recommended the weight given to the MBE be reduced from 50 percent to 35 percent.

The Multistate Bar Exam follows a multiple-choice format and that, as Gillard pointed out, is not a style of test that law students commonly face. Test takers must choose the best answer, which may not technically be the right answer, and they cannot explain their reasoning as they are able to when answering the essay questions.

Gillard, who served on the Board of Law Examiners from 2000 to 2010, remembered staying for three days each spring and summer in an Indianapolis hotel to grade hundreds of essays. Writing an essay can illustrate someone’s thought process, and even if the answer is not correct, it can still show competency.

ted waggoner Waggoner

Managing partner Ted Waggoner of Peterson Waggoner & Perkins LLP in Rochester pointed to a potential disconnect between the law school curriculum and the bar exam. Clinics and hands-on training are now a regular part of a law student’s education, but Waggoner raised the question of whether the experiential activities are eating into the teaching of the theoretical concepts and doctrinal material that are still the focus of the bar exam.

Noting the consequences of flunking the bar exam and then having to figure out how to pay off student loan debt, he has taken to carefully counseling those who are thinking of enrolling in law school.

Waggoner, who was chair of the Indiana State Bar Association’s 2015 Legal Education Conclave, recommends that individuals take a break after completing their bachelor’s degree and work for a few years before deciding whether to study law. If they do enroll and then find themselves near the bottom of the class, given the economic reality, they might want to consider dropping out.

Graduating from law school does not guarantee employment. Gillard noted the purpose of the bar exam is to protect the public by ensuring the people licensed to practice are of good moral character, high ethical standards and have a reasonable understanding of the law.

Still, as Sullivan pointed out, the difference between passing and failing the bar can be one point. IU McKinney has stepped up efforts to assist students in getting ready and navigating the two-day test.

“The passing rate on the last three bar exams have been deeply disconcerting to me and very surprising,” he said. “We are all concerned and trying to make sure the graduates are as prepared as they can be.”•


  • Grades do not equal good lawyers.
    It is time that we stop evaluating our future colleagues by their grades and class rank. Waiting a couple of years after college to apply? For what reason Ted? Neurologically, there is no increase in IQ. While we mature through experience, there is no guarantee we will mature MORE by not pursuing a passionate career as soon as we are able. Drop out when you are at the bottom of your class?! Please don't. Learning disabilities are often undiagnosed. This is common knowledge in education and the medical profession. And learning disabilities are in fact indicators often of extraordinary creativity and intelligence. And this I dare say is what our profession is starving for. I look forward to the day where we learn innovation and where job postings encourage the bottom of the class to apply. In fact, if you challenged the Socratic method or why the Multistate exists, you may in fact be someone I want to practice with. Welcome. And please stay. Academic success in law school does not translate to relationship building or healthy, happy lawyers.
  • Survey would be futile
    I like the idea of discovering how many hours were invested compared to passage rates, however, the responses would be fundamentally skewed. For the examinee would be inclined to inflate the actual hours spent studying for the bar exam due to the fact that in order for the survey to have any use, results would need tone correlated to the survey responses. This would lead an examinee to believe, albeit, unjustly that an examinee might take the hours of preparation into consideration while evaluating an applicants exam. It would be in my humble opinion essentially impossible to get accurate responses in regards to the actual hours of bar preparation each applicant actually invested. Interestingly, I just took the February 2017 bar exam, and luckily passed, and I would say that the bar exam is by no stretch of the imagination easy! The MBE is quite tricky insofar as the wording of the questions. Moreover, you prepare hours and hours for corporations, and low and behold it's not even tested. Ultimately, I agree (naturally since I passed) that the bar exam is an appropriate safe guard for the public, but I have no desire to take another exam. My final thought would be that, considering that extremely low passage rate of repeat takers, I feel as though the examiner is aware of, and hold the applicant to a higher expectation. Of course it could also simply be the applicant is just not capable of passing a bar exam. It's just astonishing how low the repeat taker passage rate it. Best!
  • The Bar Exam Has Been Getting Easier
    The exam is about being prepared and not freaking out. I saw examinees in all three of my tests literally "crying" and hair in shambles. Maybe I have become more observant over the years, but it seems like a larger percentage of examinees freak out on day 1 and do not recover for day 2. The new format of 175 out of 200 questions (February 2017 Indiana) was much easier than the MBE Format in July 2015 (I took the Florida Bar - no waiver allowed). I also thought having more FRCP questions made the exam easier compared to my first bar exam in July 2003 (New York Exam). But, you’re an experienced attorney, it should be easier for you. Right? Sure, my practice has focused on the often tested area of United States patent law - that is great preparation for the bar exam! Florida does a survey at the end of the exam to see how many hours people put towards studying for the exam. I did not receive a similar survey for Indiana. Rather than comparing statistical scores, I would be more interested in seeing the survey results over the last 5 years. Time invested vs. Passage Rate would probably be most revealing.
  • Good
    The bar exam is supposed to be a bulwark that protects the public and ensures a certain base level of quality and responsibility. It takes discipline to study for and pass the bar, which is akin to the discipline necessary to practice law correctly. The bar should be brutal. It's still not hard enough.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  2. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  3. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  4. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  5. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.