Female corporate lawyers at Anthem find opportunity, no glass ceiling

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pamela Williams was bewildered.

As an attorney and now senior vice president and counsel at Anthem Inc., she has gone pretty much wherever she wanted, literally and figuratively. She did not build her career by letting obstacles block her path or sitting patiently on the sidelines.

Her decision to become an attorney was made while in middle school, and through the next several years of schooling, she followed her parents’ advice to work diligently toward her goals and not feel intimated because she is a woman.

anthemattnys-7-15col.jpg Kathy Kiefer, Catherine Kelaghan and Pamela Williams. (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

A few years after law school, Williams became a deputy prosecutor in Fayette and Union counties. There she handled everything from traffic infractions to search warrants and felonies. She liked the work but long-term she wanted a more stable career than being a political appointee. So when a litigation position opened at Anthem, she jumped.

And that is where she was one recent afternoon when she found herself crammed in an elevator. She was among colleagues, visitors and a security guard who would escort the ensemble out to the company’s outdoor terrace which overlooks Monument Circle in downtown Indianapolis. She could go anywhere in the building, so she did not understand why they had to get clearance to walk outside.anthem-atty-bios

Finally, one member of the group tried to erase her confusion by explaining that not everyone has her confidence to walk through closed doors without permission.

Like Williams, Anthem co-workers Kathy Kiefer, corporate secretary and vice president of legal, and Catherine Kelaghan, vice president and counsel, have built their careers by working hard and charging ahead.

The three women are examples of Anthem’s diverse workforce. The billion-dollar health insurance provider notes women comprise 76 percent of its workforce and 63 percent managerial leadership.

Kiefer gained experience in private practice, working for Ice Miller LLP and as in-house counsel at Conseco Inc. before arriving at Anthem. She wanted to practice business law because she enjoys being in the boardroom more than the courtroom. Her job now calls upon her affinity for puzzles as she makes sure all the pieces fit together in the areas of corporate governance, corporate law and finance.

“I never felt the glass ceiling,” she said. “I never felt that being a woman didn’t allow me those opportunities, but I think it is getting easier as there’s more of a push to include women in higher levels of executive management and board membership.”

Working at the Internal Revenue Service after college, Kelaghan interacted with lawyers, which inspired her to pursue a legal degree. She will mark 24 years at Anthem this year, where she oversees and provides legal support to many divisions in the company, including employment and employee benefits litigation, human resources, information technology, and health care analytics. She also mentors new employees.

“I don’t know that it’s different based on gender,” she said when asked if she has noticed any differences between mentoring women and men. “I think I see more of a difference based on either career aspirations or personality, or even their own backgrounds, what they hope to accomplish.”

The trio sat down with the Indiana Lawyer to talk about their careers and how women can be successful in the law.

Q: What advice would you give to young women working as in-house counsel?

Kiefer: I would say know what your priorities are, and the things that are really important to you, try to do those. If it’s important to you to go to your kids’ activities, do that. I’m not saying don’t work hard. Absolutely work hard, put yourself out there, but know what your priorities are and be flexible.

Q: How easy is it to set priorities without having your colleagues wondering how serious you are about your career?

Williams: You definitely have a precarious balance. For me, it’s setting expectations for myself and not beating myself up. It’s about flexibility; is something absolutely critical happening right now that I have to be involved in or can I delegate that to someone? Then I have to compare that to, is it one of 50 soccer games, or is it a lead role in a play and this is the premiere night? So it’s all a balance between family and your job.

Q: The legal profession is noticing that women are leaving the law. Why did you three keep practicing?

Kiefer: I took nine months off. My kids were very young then so I had the opportunity to be a stay-at-home mom and I realized I was a much better working mother.

Kelaghan: I think we spent a lot of time getting our law degrees so we obviously want to be lawyers. The thought of not practicing law, I never thought about not doing that.

Williams: To what Kathy said, I think I’m a much better working mother than a stay-at-home mother. I wanted to have both. I wanted to be a good mom and I wanted to be back at my job, working hard and accomplishing things.

Q: To keep women practicing, do you think the model of what it means to be a lawyer has to change? Does the profession have to adjust to be more accommodating to women?

Williams: I think being in-house, we work as many hours as we would work at a law firm. The expectations are every bit as high if not higher. It’s not that less is required of you in-house, it’s culture and flexibility. I speculate in a law firm, it is just a different set of expectations but the end game of where you’re trying to get to and what is expected out of you is the same — good work, lots of work, quality work. How you get from here to there is different.

Kelaghan: From the firms we work with, I’ve seen some younger associates quit. I don’t know the demands there, but does the model have to change? Possibly. I certainly work with female partners at some of our firms, but other firms, we still work with primarily white males. It would be nice to see more diversity with those teams.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.