ILNews

Fire closes courts at historic courthouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A fire heavily damaged historic Jefferson County Courthouse Wednesday evening. Remodeling and restoration to the courthouse and cupola were completed yesterday and bunting made by women in the Indiana Department of Correction was scheduled to be hung Friday. The fire has displaced the offices and courts located inside.

The first 911 call came in to dispatchers at 6:18 p.m., said Madison Mayor Tim Armstrong. Investigators are still on the scene, but it looked like the fire may have begun in the dome or roof area. He urged people not to jump to conclusions and let investigators do their job.

At a press conference this morning, Jefferson County Commissioner Julie Berry described Wednesday as "the best of times, and the worst of times," alluding to the Charles Dickens' classic "A Tale of Two Cities." She said the courthouse looked the best it ever had in her lifetime - with nearly $175,000 invested in renovations - but then later that day it was the worst of times when the fire broke out.

The third floor had a lot of damage; the second floor had water damage and some fire damage; and the first floor and basement had water damage, it was reported at the press conference. The city hopes to salvage and restore as many documents as it can and had made backups to many documents like marriage licenses and records.

County commissioners and council members met at 8 a.m. to discuss where to relocate the offices and courts located in the courthouse. The courts are closed today while details are being worked out, Armstrong said. The city offered the courts its council chambers because it's set up similar to a courtroom, and the Madison school system has offered use of a school located about a block and a half away from the courthouse. He said neighboring Switzerland and Jennings counties also have offered use of their facilities. Officials hope to determine where the courts will be relocated by later today.

The courthouse was built around 1854 or 1856, said the mayor, and it was to be a focal point for the city's bicentennial celebration this summer. This is at least the second fire to happen in the courthouse, he said. While the city is saddened by this fire, he said they will rebuild the courthouse.

Kathryn Dolan, public information officer for the Indiana Supreme Court, said the high court is expecting a petition from the Jefferson County judges and clerk requesting Administrative Rule 17 relief. If the Supreme Court grants the petition, it would allow the courts to suspend deadlines related to civil and criminal cases for a period of time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT