Firm mergers remain steady

April 2, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Merger activity is getting back to its pre-recession levels, according to one group that tracks combinations.

When it comes to law firm mergers and acquisitions, the activity has been fairly consistent over the last six quarters, according to Altman Weil MergerLine, which tracks firm combinations and compiles statistics on the deals.

Fourteen combinations were announced in the first quarter of 2012; 11 were announced toward the end of 2011 that took effect during the first quarter of this year. Those include five firms with Indiana ties: Evansville firms Kahn Dees Donovan & Kahn and Lavallo & Frank combined; Ice Miller, based in Indianapolis, merged with Columbus, Ohio-based Schottenstein Zox & Dunn; Baker & Daniels, based in Indianapolis, combined with Minneapolis-based Faegre & Benson; and Indianapolis-based Bingham McHale merged with Louisville-based Greenebaum Doll & McDonald.

The Midwest had the third highest number of mergers and acquisitions reported in 2011 based on geographic region, according to Altman Weil.

Altman Weil principal Eric Seeger said there has been an average of 15 mergers in each of the last six quarters, a pace that is holding steady at pre-recession levels.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT