Group says going to law school could cost over $200k

May 3, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

According to the nonprofit Law School Transparency, it’s going to cost law students entering school now nearly $200,000 – and maybe more – to go to a law school in Indiana.

LST took the price of tuition and cost of living for the 2011-2012 school year and projected costs for the classes of 2015 and 2016. It took into account inflation and interest accrued, but did not factor in that some students will receive scholarships or not borrow the entire amount to subsidize tuition and expenses. LST also notes that roughly 50 percent of students have paid non-discounted rates in recent years.

The numbers are quite intimidating. Using in-state tuition rates, those graduating from either of the Indiana University law schools in 2015 or 2016 will pay between $160,000 and $168,000 when factoring in living costs; out-of-state students will rack up $228,000 to $244,000 in debt, depending on the school and year you attend.

Tuition to attend the Bloomington law school this year is around $28,000 for in-state and around $45,000 for out-of-state; in Indianapolis, it’s nearly $23,000 for in-state students and more than $43,000 for out-of-state students.

One assumes you’re going to rack up a lot of debt to go to law school, but staring at your student loan statement – especially when you first graduate – may make you wonder if you made the right decision. Let’s hope the economy has picked up by then.

Attending one of the two private schools in Indiana will set you back at least $180,000. Students who graduate from Valparaiso University Law School will rack up costs between $180,000 and $185,000; it will cost Notre Dame Law School grads anywhere from $201,000 to $207,000.

Right now, tuition is $43,000 to attend NDLS; law students at Valpo paid $38,000 this year.

In case you’re wondering, the University of California – Berkley is projected to be the most expensive place to attend law school if you’re paying the out-of-state rate. LST estimates it will be nearly $275,000 for a 2015 law grad; those graduating a year later will pay more than $280,000 to go to that school. If you’re looking for a bargain, try City University of New York – you won’t pay more than $100,000 to attend even if you’re not a New York resident.

You can take a look at how law schools compare and the methods used to calculate these numbers on LST’s website. The site also includes comparisons of the law schools’ information on employment and jobs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT