The American Bar Association is asking the U.S. Department of Treasury to reconsider possible rule changes announced in February
that are aimed at tackling money laundering and terrorist financing. The bar association believes the proposals would impose
“unreasonable and excessive” burdens on law firms.
The ABA sent a letter to the treasury department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network May 4, urging FinCEN not
to proceed with proposed rules on customer due diligence requirements for financial institutions. The proposed rules would establish a categorical
requirement for financial institutions to indentify beneficial ownership of their accountholders, subject to risk-based verification
and pursuant to an alternative definition ownership as described in the proposals. The question of beneficial ownership can
arise in the context of accounts created by an individual or entity, which could include a law firm or accounting firm, in
which these firms could be acting on behalf of another person without disclosing that fact.
The proposals, according to the ABA, would require law firms that have client trust accounts at financial institutions to
disclose the identity and other ownership information regarding the clients.
“If adopted in their current form, those proposals could impose unreasonable and excessive burdens on many law firms
with client trust accounts and could undermine both the confidential lawyer-client relationship and traditional state court
regulation of lawyers,” wrote Kevin L. Shepherd, chair of the ABA’s task force on gatekeeper regulation and the
profession.
He cites the ABA’s Voluntary Good Practices Guidance for Attorneys to Detect and Combat Money Laundering and Terrorist
Financing that the ABA House of Delegates adopted in August 2010 as a way for attorneys to address the issues raised in the
proposals without following “burdensome and rigid ‘one-size-fits all’” rules.
Shepherd believes the proposals would undermine the client-lawyer relationship and confidentiality under ABA Model Rule 1.6
and corresponding state rules.
FinCen announced last week it has extended its comment period on these proposals. Follow this link to learn how to submit comment.








Conversations
0 Comments
Add Comment