Class of 2011 faced 'brutal' entry-level job market

June 8, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

NALP has released its employment profile for law school graduates from 2011 and the numbers aren’t great. In fact, they are some of the worse NALP – The Association for Legal Career Professionals – has seen in years.

The overall employment rate for new law school graduates is 85.6 percent, the lowest it’s been since 1994. Nine months after graduating, only two-thirds of new attorneys are employed in a job that requires passing the bar.

NALP Executive Director James Leipold described the entry-level job market for these graduates as “brutal.”

“When this class took their LSATs and applied for law school, there were no signs that the legal economic boom was showing any signs of slowing, and yet by the time they graduated they faced what was arguably the worst entry-level legal employment market in more than 30 years,” he wrote in a commentary on NALP’s findings, which were released Thursday.

Less than half of employed graduates are in private practice; only once before 2011 in the 38 years NALP has been collecting employment data has this number been below 50 percent. About 18 percent were employed in business, 7.5 percent in public interest, and 9.3 percent as judicial clerks. Graduates also said they were employed in academic areas, the military and other government jobs.

As of Feb. 15, 2012, nearly 10 percent of graduates were still seeking a job, 2.5 percent weren’t looking for work, and 2.3 percent decided to continue their studies full-time. Nearly 12 percent had jobs that were considered part-time.

“I am often asked if there are signs that the entry-level job market is recovering. Certainly the employment outcomes data for the Class of 2011 document a very distressed job market. This class may represent the bottom of the employment curve for this economic cycle,” Leipold said.

Notre Dame Law School reports that of its 190 graduates from 2011, 174 are employed – 172 full-time and only two part-time. A little over 40 of those employed are working only for a short term, the highest number in four years. Only 15 graduates in 2008 reported working for a short term.

Of those employed, 162 jobs require a law degree and nine have a JD advantage.

At Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, 87 percent of 252 graduates reported being employed, with 193 of those finding work on a permanent basis. Of those employed, 145 have jobs that require a law degree, and 23 have jobs where having a law degree is an advantage.

Nearly half are employed at law firms; “business or industry” is the next largest employment area at 22.82 percent. Of those working at law firms, 51 work in firms with two to 10 attorneys; six reported starting their own practices.

Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Valparaiso University Law School did not have 2011 class statistics posted (or where I could easily find them) on their websites.

You can view the select findings on the Class of 2011 on NALP’s website.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I can understand a 10 yr suspension for drinking and driving and not following the rules,but don't you think the people who compleate their sentences and are trying to be good people of their community,and are on the right path should be able to obtain a drivers license to do as they please.We as a state should encourage good behavior instead of saying well you did all your time but we can't give you a license come on.When is a persons time served than cause from where I'm standing,its still a punishment,when u can't have the freedom to go where ever you want to in car,truck ,motorcycle,maybe their should be better programs for people instead of just throwing them away like daily trash,then expecting them to change because they we in jail or prison for x amount of yrs.Everyone should look around because we all pay each others bills,and keep each other in business..better knowledge equals better community equals better people...just my 2 cents

  2. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  3. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  4. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  5. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

ADVERTISEMENT