Nonprofit introduces own method for choosing law school

November 13, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Law School Transparency unveiled its tool to help prospective law students choose the right school for them, touting it as an alternative to the popular U.S. News & World Report law school rankings.

The LST Score Reports are “user-friendly tools for sorting law school employment outcomes, projected costs, and admission stats,” according to the LST release on the reports. The score reports are not rankings, the nonprofit organization emphasizes, unlike the rankings provided by U.S. News & World Report.

You can view the score reports at http://www.lstscorereports.com/.

LST says the reports should be used as a starting point and a comparison tool to other rankings or classifications of law schools.

“Focus on outcomes and how much it will cost you to get there,” the website says. “Reputation, after all, is only as valuable as the ends you want that it can help you actually achieve. You can’t eat prestige.”

The 3-year-old nonprofit was created by two Vanderbilt University Law Students and aims to improve consumer information on legal education and reform the traditional law school model.

The latest rankings by U.S. News & World Report list Notre Dame Law School at No. 22; Indiana University Maurer School of Law at No. 26; and Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law at No. 89 overall best law school. Valparaiso University Law School appears on the list as unranked.

You may want to take a look at LST’s guides to using and reading the report before jumping to conclusions about the list. The Employment Score has been calculated by the bar passage rate, minus part-time jobs, short-term jobs and solo practitioners, with that figure divided by all graduates. The guide doesn’t explain what years are used to compile the data.

Based on that formula, Notre Dame Law School has the highest employment score in the state. They also have the fewest number of graduates employed in Indiana. Then comes I.U. Maurer School of Law at 59.5 percent employment score, I.U. McKinney School of Law at 52 percent, and Valparaiso University Law School at 39.2 percent. Based on LST calculations, Valpo had the most under-employed graduates.

The under-employment score is calculated by taking the number of unemployed graduates, minus the total sum of those not seeking jobs, those who have short-term or part-time jobs, nonprofessional jobs, or are pursuing another degree, divided by the number of all graduates. Again, it’s helpful to read their guides to understand how LST came up with their figures.

You can view Indiana’s data for yourself here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT