When opponents of the much talked about proposed amendment to ban gay marriage cite a study showing that the ban could impact
614 Indiana laws, they’ll be using research performed by students at Indiana University Maurer School of Law.
More than 25 students in the LGBT Project at the law school spent nine months researching and cataloguing Indiana statutes
related to married and family life. Their research has been published by Indiana Equality Action, a nonprofit that is fighting
the push to pass an amendment banning gay marriage in Indiana.
“What is clear from this compendium is the extent to which Indiana law uses civil marriage as a way to classify, grant
rights to, and impose responsibilities upon couples and families in 614 ways. We hope that it serves as a resource for examining
how legislative action around marriage can affect all Hoosier couples and families,” the executive board of the LGBT
Project writes in the introduction.
Indiana Equality Action says that awareness of how pervasive the rights and benefits of civil marriage in Indiana are in
the statutes is important to “meaningful dialogue concerning a proposed amendment to Indiana’s Constitution that
would invalidate and prohibit recognition of any ‘legal status’ identical or ‘substantially similar’
to marriage for unmarried couples.
“Whether one supports or opposes such a proposal, knowing what is involved in something as enduring as an amendment
to the Bill of Rights in Indiana’s highest legal document is critical to enlightened public discourse and decision,”
the organization continues in the report, “More than Just a Couple: 614 Reasons Why Marriage Equality Matters in Indiana.”
The report points to several areas of the law which the students say would be impacted if the amendment
passes, including employment and education, property and taxation, and probate and trusts.
Even if you take the gay marriage component out of it, it is a good resource for knowing statutes that are affected by a
civil marriage. The intro does note that the document shouldn’t be construed as legal advice and the views expressed
in the document are those of the law student authors.








Conversations
6 Comments
Add Comment