Chances are, your mom wanted you to marry a lawyer

May 30, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Are you married to an attorney? If not, your mom may be a little disappointed.

A Lawyers.com survey interviewed nearly 1,000 people in April about whether they want their child to be a lawyer or marry one. Moms were more likely to want a lawyer as a son- or daughter-in-law, with 55 percent answering affirmatively. A potential lawyer in-law only appealed to 38 percent of dads.

Nearly two-thirds of parents polled would like their child to be an attorney when he or she grows up. It’s interesting to see how the family’s income plays a role in this desire. The survey revealed 80 percent of parents with household incomes less than $25,000 a year said they’d like their child to pursue a legal career; 54 percent of those with incomes over $75,000 want a lawyer in the family.

“Being a lawyer means being a respected professional, and that’s something that parents want for their children,” said Larry Bodine, editor-in-chief of Lawyers.com. These parents must not be aware of the negative attention law schools and the legal profession are receiving these days, thanks to high student debt rates and fewer employment possibilities.

Fess up: did your parents want you to become an attorney? Did any hope you’d marry a lawyer?

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Oh my lordy Therapist Oniha of the winexbackspell@gmail.com I GOT Briggs BACK. Im so excited, It only took 2days for him to come home. bless divinity and bless god. i must be dreaming as i never thoughts he would be back to me after all this time. I am so much shock and just cant believe my eyes. thank you thank you thank you from the bottom of my heart,he always kiss and hug me now at all times,am so happy my heart is back to me with your help Therapist Oniha.

  2. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  3. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  4. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  5. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

ADVERTISEMENT