Indiana has more lawyers than legal work

June 5, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If you were a new law school grad in recent years this may not be news to you, but Indiana has more potential lawyers than legal work available, based on research by a blog.

The Law School Tuition Bubble’s Matt Leichter broke down how states faired in 2011 regarding the number of attorneys as compared to jobs for lawyers. Indiana made the top 10 of worst states, based on the number of law grads for each job opening. Those law grads may or may not have passed the bar.

We had 3.03 law grads for each job opening, based on those 2011 numbers. Mississippi has the unfortunate distinction of coming in first with 10.53 law grads for each job opening. Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska and New York were also in the top 10. The statistics include law grad numbers from ABA-accredited law schools and are based on projected annual lawyer job growth by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and state governments for 2011.

Leichter explains his research and methodology in an Am Law Daily article last month.

Are you surprised by the numbers for Indiana?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Faulty Logic
    Headline says not enough "Legal Work" when actually the data relates to available positions/jobs. Illogical to conclude that just because job opening are few there is no "legal work" needing a lawyer in Indiana! As pro bono plan administrator for NWI I can assure the legal world that there are many many folks who need "legal work" help and can barely pay their rent/food/utilities/gas for work, let alone a lawyer.
  • Good
    The Tax lawyer throughout India help in dealing with the particular specialists, as well as provide you with a preventing probability for a realistic solution. the abilities along with remaining operating can be a significant component of having a profitable legal career. Guides could perform a vital component in your skilled improvement. nctrafficlawyer

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  2. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

  3. wow is this a bunch of bs! i know the facts!

  4. MCBA .... time for a new release about your entire membership (or is it just the alter ego) being "saddened and disappointed" in the failure to lynch a police officer protecting himself in the line of duty. But this time against Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "WASHINGTON — Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?ref=us&_r=0

  5. Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

ADVERTISEMENT