Law firm’s advertising takes to the streets

February 3, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

We’ve all seen law firms and attorneys advertise on billboards, bus stops and the sides of city buses (I’m looking at you, Ken Nunn.). But Monday morning, an advertisement for a law firm I saw while walking into my office made me take notice.

A car drove by me covered in advertisements for what I believe was for The Criminal Defense Team law firm of Baldwin Adams and Karmish in Franklin. (I apologize if this is the wrong firm, but I only had a few seconds to look at the car and realize that it was a law firm ad all over it.) What firm it was isn’t as important to me as the fact that a law firm decided to advertise using a car.

When I say covered in advertisements, I don’t mean like a NASCAR stockcar. The sedan features a wrap/wraps, which cover the car, but also blend in. The car caught my eye because I saw a huge logo and man’s face driving by me. That’s when I realized it was for a law firm.

Using your vehicle is a creative and effective way to reach the public, especially if you are a criminal defense attorney. Usually, those who need a defense attorney aren’t going to already have one on speed dial. And, with the new expungement law proving popular, people with convictions are seeking attorneys to help them navigate the new law.  Plastering your firm name and contact info on the side of a car gives you far more reach than a billboard on the side of the road because you can drive to various parts of a city, county or the state.

Have you seen this car driving around central Indiana? Are there other law firms that use their vehicles as advertisement?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • enough
    Law firm advertising is everywhere. This should be the subject of a study. Drive around I-465 in Indianapolis. My guess is every fifth billboard is a personal injury / criminal defense lawyer. Not to mention, day time TV commercials for personal injury firms. A law professor should do a study on an estimate of how much liability (ie $) is exchanged in Indiana and is the amount of advertising worth it...thank you.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT