Survey calls law firm benefit changes ‘stealth cost shifting’

April 9, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Large law firm benefit trends paint a somewhat  “conflicted picture” as firms try to manage plan expenses while at the same time lag behind the broader market’s adaptation of consumerism to save costs, based on results of a national survey.

Frenkel Benefits, the independent employee benefits division of Frenkel & Co., an insurance brokerage firm, released the results of its 2013 biennial Law Firm Survey. The survey looks at emerging trends in the benefit programs of large law firms.

Adam Okun, who wrote a blog post on the results for the company, called the design changes made by firms “stealth cost shifting,” – changes that preserve the more visible features of the health plans but reduce the plans’ cost in less recognizable ways.

Some key points highlighted by Okun based on the 51 participating law firms surveyed:

•    PPO/POS plans are the most popular, which include more than 50 percent of law firm employees. High deductible health plans are only popular with partners, who enroll in them because of their favorable tax treatment.

•    Health care inflation at law firms was 7 percent, which exceeded national employer-sponsored health care plan inflation by 2 percent. Okun says this reflects the industry’s reluctance to dilute benefit levels.

•    Wellness offerings from law firms have scaled back.

•    There is also a noticeable movement away from blanket coverage of post-retiree medical for partners and more firms are offering transgender surgery coverage, infertility benefits and domestic partner coverage.

“Given the ongoing contraction in demand for legal services and the consequential imperative to examine the underlying cost/expense structure of big law firms, it will be interesting to see when the industry will pivot from traditionally paternalistic, high-cost benefits plans to consumer-directed, employee-activating models,” Okun writes.

I was unable to find a link to the actual survey, but you can read a little more about it on Frenkel Benefits’ blog. Here’s a link to the 2011 survey results if you’re interested to see how this year’s results compare.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. A sad end to a prolific gadfly. Indiana has suffered a great loss in the journalistic realm.

  2. Good riddance to this dangerous activist judge

  3. What is the one thing the Hoosier legal status quo hates more than a whistleblower? A lawyer whistleblower taking on the system man to man. That must never be rewarded, must always, always, always be punished, lest the whole rotten tree be felled.

  4. I want to post this to keep this tread alive and hope more of David's former clients might come forward. In my case, this coward of a man represented me from June 2014 for a couple of months before I fired him. I knew something was wrong when he blatantly lied about what he had advised me in my contentious and unfortunate divorce trial. His impact on the proceedings cast a very long shadow and continues to impact me after a lengthy 19 month divorce. I would join a class action suit.

  5. The dispute in LB Indiana regarding lake front property rights is typical of most beach communities along our Great Lakes. Simply put, communication to non owners when visiting the lakefront would be beneficial. The Great Lakes are designated navigational waters (including shorelines). The high-water mark signifies the area one is able to navigate. This means you can walk, run, skip, etc. along the shores. You can't however loiter, camp, sunbath in front of someones property. Informational signs may be helpful to owners and visitors. Our Great Lakes are a treasure that should be enjoyed by all. PS We should all be concerned that the Long Beach, Indiana community is on septic systems.

ADVERTISEMENT