Survey calls law firm benefit changes ‘stealth cost shifting’

April 9, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Large law firm benefit trends paint a somewhat  “conflicted picture” as firms try to manage plan expenses while at the same time lag behind the broader market’s adaptation of consumerism to save costs, based on results of a national survey.

Frenkel Benefits, the independent employee benefits division of Frenkel & Co., an insurance brokerage firm, released the results of its 2013 biennial Law Firm Survey. The survey looks at emerging trends in the benefit programs of large law firms.

Adam Okun, who wrote a blog post on the results for the company, called the design changes made by firms “stealth cost shifting,” – changes that preserve the more visible features of the health plans but reduce the plans’ cost in less recognizable ways.

Some key points highlighted by Okun based on the 51 participating law firms surveyed:

•    PPO/POS plans are the most popular, which include more than 50 percent of law firm employees. High deductible health plans are only popular with partners, who enroll in them because of their favorable tax treatment.

•    Health care inflation at law firms was 7 percent, which exceeded national employer-sponsored health care plan inflation by 2 percent. Okun says this reflects the industry’s reluctance to dilute benefit levels.

•    Wellness offerings from law firms have scaled back.

•    There is also a noticeable movement away from blanket coverage of post-retiree medical for partners and more firms are offering transgender surgery coverage, infertility benefits and domestic partner coverage.

“Given the ongoing contraction in demand for legal services and the consequential imperative to examine the underlying cost/expense structure of big law firms, it will be interesting to see when the industry will pivot from traditionally paternalistic, high-cost benefits plans to consumer-directed, employee-activating models,” Okun writes.

I was unable to find a link to the actual survey, but you can read a little more about it on Frenkel Benefits’ blog. Here’s a link to the 2011 survey results if you’re interested to see how this year’s results compare.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  2. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

  3. If our State Government would sue for their rights to grow HEMP like Kentucky did we would not have these issues. AND for your INFORMATION many medical items are also made from HEMP. FOOD, FUEL,FIBER,TEXTILES and MEDICINE are all uses for this plant. South Bend was built on Hemp. Our states antiquated fear of cannabis is embarrassing on the world stage. We really need to lead the way rather than follow. Some day.. we will have freedom in Indiana. And I for one will continue to educate the good folks of this state to the beauty and wonder of this magnificent plant.

  4. Put aside all the marijuana concerns, we are talking about food and fiber uses here. The federal impediments to hemp cultivation are totally ridiculous. Preposterous. Biggest hemp cultivators are China and Europe. We get most of ours from Canada. Hemp is as versatile as any crop ever including corn and soy. It's good the governor laid the way for this, regrettable the buffoons in DC stand in the way. A statutory relic of the failed "war on drugs"

  5. Cannabis is GOOD for our PEOPLE and GOOD for our STATE... 78% would like to see legal access to the product line for better Hoosier Heath. There is a 25% drop in PAIN KILLER Overdoses in states where CANNABIS is legal.

ADVERTISEMENT