How do managing partners manage their social media?

September 17, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Do you have a LinkedIn account? If you are a managing partner, then you most likely do, although your online presence may be begrudgingly, depending on your age.

Results from the 2014 Managing Partner Social Media Survey – Part I reveal that the overwhelming majority of respondents to the survey have a LinkedIn account, a social network connecting professionals. The sample size of this survey is small, only 119 responses, but they do give a glimpse of how managing partners feel about the social network.

As you would expect, the younger the partner, the more likely they are to have a LinkedIn account and find social media to be exciting. Seventy-five percent of those ages 39 or younger feel social media is exciting; only 27 percent of respondents over the age of 60 feel the same. A third of those over 60 find it to be a necessary evil.

But even if they aren’t fans of social media, 86 percent of those over age 50 have a LinkedIn account. All responding managing partners under age 50 reported having an account.

And don’t let the older partners’ “evil” belief fool you – 43 percent of those over the age of 60 access their accounts daily; 38 percent access them weekly. Half of those 39 and younger access their accounts daily and a third check their accounts weekly.

The survey also asks why managing partners aren’t active, if they created their own account and how active they are in LinkedIn groups online. Responses from those ages 40-59 are also available.

PR and marketing agency Jaffe and conference series Managing Partner Forum, which conducted the survey, say that those who are not active on LinkedIn are missing a huge opportunity to shape their reputations in the marketplace and connect with in-house counsel, who overwhelmingly do see the value in LinkedIn.

Part II of the survey, which will provide data on firm-wide social media policies and practices, will be published next month.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.