Legal sector cuts 1,100 jobs in May

June 11, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Looks like the legal profession is starting to feel the effects of the slowing economy. According to the latest statistics from the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. legal sector lost 1,100 jobs in May. That’s the third consecutive month of losses for the industry. But lawyers, clerks, paralegals, and others aren’t having just a bad couple of months. Overall, the legal services sector in the U.S. has cut 4,200 jobs in the last six months and nearly 10,000 since last year at this time.



What about Indiana? So far, the public sentiment seems to be that Indiana law firms aren’t reeling from the downturn in the economy like firms in Chicago, New York, or other larger markets. Indiana attorneys often tout the fact that national legal trends – especially the negative ones – don’t often happen here, are slow to happen, or don’t happen on the kind of scale that other markets see. Indiana’s Department of Workforce Development keeps records of legal profession job numbers, but only by year, so it’s hard to know how Indiana legal workers have fared this year.



Do Indiana attorneys just have their heads in the sand, hoping the dark cloud of job cuts will blow past Indiana? There may be some signs that Indiana isn’t immune to legal job cuts due to the economy. Indiana Lawyer reporter Rebecca Berfanger had several firms deny her request for interviews about whether their summer associate hiring has been affected by the state of the economy, which usually means there isn’t good news to report. Law firms rarely deny a chance to tout the positive happenings at their firms.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT