Survey says: Do something about it

June 27, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bar associations survey their members to find out everything from salary to time off to satisfaction with the county judges. They publish the results for the world to see and sometimes, news organizations like us report on the findings. But then what?

The Allegheny County Bar Association in Pennsylvania is taking the results of its 2005 survey regarding disparity in pay between the genders and enacting an Institute for Gender Equality. The institute will offer programs about various topics like mentoring and work-life balance, track its participants, and follow up with them for feedback. The programs will begin early next year.

Bar associations and legal organizations across the country publish numerous surveys every year indicating the difference in treatment, pay, and work lives for female lawyers as compared to their male counterparts. It’s great to see a bar association take a proactive approach to attempt to eliminate some of the issues discovered or reinforced in the surveys.

Indiana State Bar Association Women in Law Committee chair Angela Hopper said the state bar is in the infancy stages of a program with the ultimate goal of something similar to what the Allegheny County Bar Association offers. The Women in Law Committee surveyed members in 2006 and 2007 and gave the results to the Judicial System Committee. The plan is to conduct similar surveys every couple of years, compare the results, and see what kind of programs need to be implemented, she said. The goal is to eventually come up with guidelines to address any inequalities and problems facing female attorneys.

Unfortunately, inequality still exists between male and female workers in all professions, and that’s why there is a committee for women in the law. Hopper did offer some hope for female attorneys in Indiana: based on the most recent survey, Indiana – as compared to the surrounding states – overall is a good state to practice in. Let’s hope future surveys continue to reinforce that finding and assist in closing the gender inequality issues faced in the legal profession.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  2. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  3. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  4. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  5. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

ADVERTISEMENT