Loans and the public sector

August 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
President Bush signed the Higher Education Opportunity Act, H.R. 4137, into law last week, which provides loan forgiveness for students entering public services jobs, including public defenders, prosecutors, and legal aid attorneys.

In exchange for committing to work for at least three years as an attorney in one of the above fields, the attorney general will have the obligation to repay up to $10,000 a calendar year in student loans for those attorneys. The law limits the amount of money a graduate can have repaid by the attorney general and who will receive priority in having repayment benefits.

This is a great idea and it’s about time the government stepped up and helped out college graduates who choose to help the public instead of getting a high-paying salary in a nice office. Smothered under a mountain of law school debt after three years, many students look to private practice and law firms to earn bigger salaries than what public defenders and prosecutors’ offices can offer. I guarantee you there will be more law students looking more closely at entering a public service job as opposed to joining a law firm because of this program.

Turnover is high in public defenders and prosecutors’ offices because attorneys earn low pay for the amount of work they do as compared to private practice attorneys. Does this law have its limitations? Sure. Will this mean there will be a huge rush in applications to the public defender’s office? Probably not, but I bet there will be more interest from students who were debating whether to go that route.

This new law is a step in the right direction in ensuring more quality attorneys will choose to enter the public service sector, not only because they want to, but now they can more easily afford to.

Updates about the implementation of the bill will be made available at Equal Justice Works, which has been following the bill and its real world applications.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Does anyone know how and when prosecutors can apply for loan forgiveness under H.R. 4137?
  • We\'re currently working on a story about HR 4137 and what it means.

    The part about who is eligible and how is (more or less) under Section 952, about Page 393 of the 431-page bill. Information about civil legal aid attorneys is under Section 431, around Page 165.

    The entire document includes information about other higher education programs and repayment initiatives.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The ADA acts as a tax upon all for the benefit of a few. And, most importantly, the many have no individual say in whether they pay the tax. Those with handicaps suffered in military service should get a pass, but those who are handicapped by accident or birth do NOT deserve that pass. The drivel about "equal access" is spurious because the handicapped HAVE equal access, they just can't effectively use it. That is their problem, not society's. The burden to remediate should be that of those who seek the benefit of some social, constructional, or dimensional change, NOT society generally. Everybody wants to socialize the costs and concentrate the benefits of government intrusion so that they benefit and largely avoid the costs. This simply maintains the constant push to the slop trough, and explains, in part, why the nation is 20 trillion dollars in the hole.

  2. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  3. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  4. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  5. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

ADVERTISEMENT