Tidbits on the ISBA

October 2, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
During a conversation today with Indiana Lawyer reporter Rebecca Berfanger, the incoming Indiana State Bar Association president mentioned something that caught our attention: Not only does he have a Facebook page, but the ISBA has a Facebook group page.

Bill Jonas told Berfanger he’s noticed with his own children how communications have changed among college students and those just out of college since he was in school.

The state bar’s Facebook group page has information about joining the ISBA and a link to its official Web site.  Jonas said one way the Facebook page may help young attorneys and law students decide to join is the site will help connect members with each other about the organization’s events and news, and paperless communication between the bar and young members is becoming more common.

Jonas’ Facebook page is linked to the group with a total of six members – so far – but you have to be a member of Facebook and Jonas’ “friend” to see information on his page.

Also, reporter Michael Hoskins is attending the ISBA’s annual meeting in Indianapolis. This afternoon, he went to the Appellate Practice Section’s meeting, from which he passes along several interesting tidbits.

- The Indiana Appellate Pro Bono Project, which is nearing its two-year anniversary, is progressing but is short on cases. There are a lot of lawyers who want to get involved, but there’s a lack of cases for them to work on.

- There’s going to be a CLE later this month to discuss video records specific to the appellate courts, such as webcasts or court hearings. Word is this is something happening in other states, and it won’t be long until it comes up here.

- What happens to trial courts when their judges attend the annual meeting? There are plenty of appellate and trial court judges in attendance, so are trial judges able to shift and juggle caseloads in order to go to the meeting or are the courts temporarily shut down to accommodate the judges’ schedules?

Later today, Michael will be attending a session on the changing face of Indiana’s federal courts, “Transitions in the Federal Court: New Faces, New Roles,” and will have an update for blog readers Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT