Flexibility key for students

February 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Some advice for law students struggling to find summer work: be flexible and think broadly. That’s what the director of the career and development office at Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington told Indiana Lawyer Friday.

Comments from our previous blog on students’ summer associate searches last fall and this year shed a little light on the issues facing current law students. Summer associate positions are being slashed and fewer are receiving offers. The ones that did receive a position are keeping their joy to a minimum to spare the feelings of friends who didn’t get an offer.

Some law firms have eliminated summer associate positions for 1Ls; and many are cutting back significantly on their 2L programs, according to Caroline Dowd-Higgins from the Bloomington law school. She said as a result of the cuts, students have to be more creative and scrappier to get other experience.

Dowd-Higgins has suggested students look to non-profits and small law firms. Students may be able to earn credit from their law schools for their internships at non-profits, and small firms do consider hiring an unpaid law student.

In fact, the small law firms may have more business right now because of their typically lower hourly rates, so it would be in students’ best interests to consider contacting small firms for possible summer work.

Dowd-Higgins said the law school is encouraging students to network and build new connections so when the market does bounce back, they will have a leg up on others.

There’s no sugarcoating that this is a bad time for law students, she said, and it’s probably going to get worse before it gets better, but it will get better. In the meantime, students should keep sharpening their skills and consider looking outside large firms for summer work, even if that means accepting an unpaid position.

How many of you have summer work with a small law firm or non-profit this year? If you tried to go that route, did you find it was tough trying to get a job there?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT