Flexibility key for students

February 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Some advice for law students struggling to find summer work: be flexible and think broadly. That’s what the director of the career and development office at Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington told Indiana Lawyer Friday.

Comments from our previous blog on students’ summer associate searches last fall and this year shed a little light on the issues facing current law students. Summer associate positions are being slashed and fewer are receiving offers. The ones that did receive a position are keeping their joy to a minimum to spare the feelings of friends who didn’t get an offer.

Some law firms have eliminated summer associate positions for 1Ls; and many are cutting back significantly on their 2L programs, according to Caroline Dowd-Higgins from the Bloomington law school. She said as a result of the cuts, students have to be more creative and scrappier to get other experience.

Dowd-Higgins has suggested students look to non-profits and small law firms. Students may be able to earn credit from their law schools for their internships at non-profits, and small firms do consider hiring an unpaid law student.

In fact, the small law firms may have more business right now because of their typically lower hourly rates, so it would be in students’ best interests to consider contacting small firms for possible summer work.

Dowd-Higgins said the law school is encouraging students to network and build new connections so when the market does bounce back, they will have a leg up on others.

There’s no sugarcoating that this is a bad time for law students, she said, and it’s probably going to get worse before it gets better, but it will get better. In the meantime, students should keep sharpening their skills and consider looking outside large firms for summer work, even if that means accepting an unpaid position.

How many of you have summer work with a small law firm or non-profit this year? If you tried to go that route, did you find it was tough trying to get a job there?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  2. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  3. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

  4. The fee increase would be livable except for the 11% increase in spending at the Disciplinary Commission. The Commission should be focused on true public harm rather than going on witch hunts against lawyers who dare to criticize judges.

  5. Marijuana is safer than alcohol. AT the time the 1937 Marijuana Tax Act was enacted all major pharmaceutical companies in the US sold marijuana products. 11 Presidents of the US have smoked marijuana. Smoking it does not increase the likelihood that you will get lung cancer. There are numerous reports of canabis oil killing many kinds of incurable cancer. (See Rick Simpson's Oil on the internet or facebook).

ADVERTISEMENT