No coffee = firm trouble?

March 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
If you came to work one morning to find out that your company no long provided free coffee because it wanted to save money, would you be angry, worried, or indifferent?

One Chicago firm has reportedly cut free coffee service in an attempt to save money. Some there look at it as a bad sign and that the firm is in trouble.

Yes, it’s just a perk to have coffee provided for free in your office, but it’s a nice perk that many people depend on and enjoy. The same goes for a water cooler, refrigerator to store your lunch, or vending machines. Do you have to have these to do your job? No, but it sure is nice to know your company is looking out for you and trying to make your hours on the job more comfortable.

Back to my original question: how would you feel if your firm started making cuts to small perks you enjoy? Would you be upset because you need to have your coffee to get through the day and now you’d have to bring it from home or buy it elsewhere? Would you be worried this was a sign the company was in trouble if it’s resorted to cutting coffee service? Perhaps you don’t drink coffee or you don’t care one way or another.

Have your firms started to cut costs in small areas? Does it bother you or would rather them cut coffee service or supplies than cut your job or freeze pay?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. A sad end to a prolific gadfly. Indiana has suffered a great loss in the journalistic realm.

  2. Good riddance to this dangerous activist judge

  3. What is the one thing the Hoosier legal status quo hates more than a whistleblower? A lawyer whistleblower taking on the system man to man. That must never be rewarded, must always, always, always be punished, lest the whole rotten tree be felled.

  4. I want to post this to keep this tread alive and hope more of David's former clients might come forward. In my case, this coward of a man represented me from June 2014 for a couple of months before I fired him. I knew something was wrong when he blatantly lied about what he had advised me in my contentious and unfortunate divorce trial. His impact on the proceedings cast a very long shadow and continues to impact me after a lengthy 19 month divorce. I would join a class action suit.

  5. The dispute in LB Indiana regarding lake front property rights is typical of most beach communities along our Great Lakes. Simply put, communication to non owners when visiting the lakefront would be beneficial. The Great Lakes are designated navigational waters (including shorelines). The high-water mark signifies the area one is able to navigate. This means you can walk, run, skip, etc. along the shores. You can't however loiter, camp, sunbath in front of someones property. Informational signs may be helpful to owners and visitors. Our Great Lakes are a treasure that should be enjoyed by all. PS We should all be concerned that the Long Beach, Indiana community is on septic systems.

ADVERTISEMENT