Disaster plans at firms

March 12, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A fire in downtown Indianapolis has made two firms thankful they have disaster plans already in place.



I spoke with John Trimble at LewisWagner and Peter Pogue at Schultz and Pogue this morning about the fire, and both reiterated the importance of disaster plans at firms. The two firms are located in close proximity to the apartment building that caught fire this morning. They both said if the wind had blown in a different direction, there was a chance their buildings could have caught fire. LewisWagner did suffer damage to some windows facing the fire. (The photo in this post was taken by Pogue from his law office this morning.)

“After Hurricane Katrina and the windstorm that damaged the bank building downtown, we implemented a disaster program with off-site electronic storage,” Trimble said. “This fire was a reminder that all prudent law firms should have a disaster plan.”

Pogue said his firm met with Beth Knotts of Hill Fulwider after the damage that firm sustained from the storm downtown in April 2006 and developed a disaster plan for Schultz and Pogue.

“While we did not need to fully implement that plan today, several aspects for securing computers and personnel notification were implemented and worked well,” Pogue said. “Another reminder how having a disaster plan in place is so important for law firms.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT