Out-of-town seminars

April 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Given today’s economy, is now the time to be spending big bucks to send attorneys to seminars in other cities? I recently received a brochure about a litigation/workplace strategies seminar presented by a law firm with multiple locations in the U.S. that’s happening next month at a resort in Miami.

The organizers even acknowledge that now’s probably not the best time to be flying attorneys around the country to attend a seminar, but reach out to prospective attendees by saying because of the economy, it’s even more important to invest in learning about employment law changes.

Another way to entice attorneys: the event is offering registration of three people for the price of two.

It’s a deal then to be able to send three attorneys for the price of two, so why shouldn’t a firm take up the offer? Perception, mostly. A long weekend in Miami sounds nice, but is it necessary for an attorney to travel there to obtain the information from the event? Couldn’t he or she get it in another form, i.e. webinar, a local CLE or seminar, instead of traveling to a resort?

Plus, depending on what firm you may work in, if there have been staff layoffs recently or whispers of struggles in the firm, what message does that send to employees if some attorneys are sent to Miami or another far-off location for a seminar?

Seminars in a nice location over a long weekend are great – you get to learn while enjoying a new city or relaxing in your down time, but right now may not the best time to attend one.

What do you think? Is now really a bad time to attend an out-of-town seminar (especially one at a resort) or because of the discounts and struggling economy, should firms attend to get a leg up on the competition?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  2. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

  3. No, Ron Drake is not running against incumbent Larry Bucshon. That’s totally wrong; and destructively misleading to say anything like that. All political candidates, including me in the 8th district, are facing voters, not incumbents. You should not firewall away any of voters’ options. We need them all now more than ever. Right? Y’all have for decades given the Ds and Rs free 24/7/365 coverage of taxpayer-supported promotion at the expense of all alternatives. That’s plenty of head-start, money-in-the-pocket advantage for parties and people that don’t need any more free immunities, powers, privileges and money denied all others. Now it’s time to play fair and let voters know that there are, in fact, options. Much, much better, and not-corrupt options. Liberty or Bust! Andy Horning Libertarian for IN08 USA House of Representatives Freedom, Indiana

  4. A great idea! There is absolutely no need to incarcerate HRC's so-called "super predators" now that they can be adequately supervised on the streets by the BLM czars.

  5. One of the only qualms I have with this article is in the first paragraph, that heroin use is especially dangerous because it is highly addictive. All opioids are highly addictive. It is why, after becoming addicted to pain medications prescribed by their doctors for various reasons, people resort to heroin. There is a much deeper issue at play, and no drug use should be taken lightly in this category.

ADVERTISEMENT