Law school ranking shuffle

April 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
I feel like I need an advanced degree just to understand the methodology behind the recent U.S. News and World Report’s ranking of law schools, in which one Indiana law school jumped higher in the rankings and one fell dramatically.

This year’s rankings: Indiana University Maurer School of Law and University of Notre Dame Law School tied for 23rd; Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis sits at 87 with six other law schools; and Valparaiso University School of Law remained alphabetically listed under Tier 4 schools.

The Bloomington law school went up from No. 36 last year; IU – Indy dropped 19 spots, and ND just lost one spot from last year.

I never went to graduate school, so I may never understand the interest in these rankings year after year. Are they really that influential as to where you decide to spend three years and tens of thousands of dollars going into debt to become an attorney?

Answer me this: How does IU – Indy jump nearly 20 spots in 2008’s list only to fall back down nearly the same amount this year? The new methodology says it’s factoring in part-time students into the mix now, but IU – Indy’s part-time program ranked 21st. Plus, the school finished in the top 10 in legal writing and teaching health-care law. How can those rankings not help the school achieve a higher rank?

U.S. News and World Report’s Web site also says for the first time it has averaged the two most recent year’s surveys to compute the assessment score among professionals who hire new graduates. It also looked at the qualities students and faculty bring to their educational experiences and graduates’ achievements linked to their degrees. What does that mean? If 20 Maurer School of Law graduates received “Super Lawyer” designations and only 5 did from IU- Indy, does that affect the score? I sure hope not. Is it based on how many students from each school are on the partner track? Again, no clue.

Really it boils down to how objective these rankings can be and on that, I’m not sure. The methodology based the rankings on 12 weighted averages of measures of various data. Data typically doesn’t lie, but again, I go back to the “graduates’ achievements linked to their degrees” criteria to question the final results.

Needless to say, some law school deans don’t enjoy this time of year when the rankings come out and even want to do away with them. Students seem to anxiously wait to see where their school ranks, as noted by all talk about the “leaked” results earlier this week.

Let’s hear from you as students or attorneys. How influential were these rankings on where you went to law school? Do you feel pride when your school jumps up in the rankings and anger when it goes down? How much weight should be given to these types of rankings?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Someone off their meds? C'mon John, it is called the politics of Empire. Get with the program, will ya? How can we build one world under secularist ideals without breaking a few eggs? Of course, once it is fully built, is the American public who will feel the deadly grip of the velvet glove. One cannot lay down with dogs without getting fleas. The cup of wrath is nearly full, John Smith, nearly full. Oops, there I go, almost sounding as alarmist as Smith. Guess he and I both need to listen to this again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRnQ65J02XA

  2. Charles Rice was one of the greatest of the so-called great generation in America. I was privileged to count him among my mentors. He stood firm for Christ and Christ's Church in the Spirit of Thomas More, always quick to be a good servant of the King, but always God's first. I had Rice come speak to 700 in Fort Wayne as Obama took office. Rice was concerned that this rise of aggressive secularism and militant Islam were dual threats to Christendom,er, please forgive, I meant to say "Western Civilization". RIP Charlie. You are safe at home.

  3. It's a big fat black mark against the US that they radicalized a lot of these Afghan jihadis in the 80s to fight the soviets and then when they predictably got around to biting the hand that fed them, the US had to invade their homelands, install a bunch of corrupt drug kingpins and kleptocrats, take these guys and torture the hell out of them. Why for example did the US have to sodomize them? Dubya said "they hate us for our freedoms!" Here, try some of that freedom whether you like it or not!!! Now they got even more reasons to hate us-- lets just keep bombing the crap out of their populations, installing more puppet regimes, arming one faction against another, etc etc etc.... the US is becoming a monster. No wonder they hate us. Here's my modest recommendation. How about we follow "Just War" theory in the future. St Augustine had it right. How about we treat these obvious prisoners of war according to the Geneva convention instead of torturing them in sadistic and perverted ways.

  4. As usual, John is "spot-on." The subtle but poignant points he makes are numerous and warrant reflection by mediators and users. Oh but were it so simple.

  5. ACLU. Way to step up against the police state. I see a lot of things from the ACLU I don't like but this one is a gold star in its column.... instead of fighting it the authorities should apologize and back off.

ADVERTISEMENT