Law school ranking shuffle

April 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
I feel like I need an advanced degree just to understand the methodology behind the recent U.S. News and World Report’s ranking of law schools, in which one Indiana law school jumped higher in the rankings and one fell dramatically.

This year’s rankings: Indiana University Maurer School of Law and University of Notre Dame Law School tied for 23rd; Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis sits at 87 with six other law schools; and Valparaiso University School of Law remained alphabetically listed under Tier 4 schools.

The Bloomington law school went up from No. 36 last year; IU – Indy dropped 19 spots, and ND just lost one spot from last year.

I never went to graduate school, so I may never understand the interest in these rankings year after year. Are they really that influential as to where you decide to spend three years and tens of thousands of dollars going into debt to become an attorney?

Answer me this: How does IU – Indy jump nearly 20 spots in 2008’s list only to fall back down nearly the same amount this year? The new methodology says it’s factoring in part-time students into the mix now, but IU – Indy’s part-time program ranked 21st. Plus, the school finished in the top 10 in legal writing and teaching health-care law. How can those rankings not help the school achieve a higher rank?

U.S. News and World Report’s Web site also says for the first time it has averaged the two most recent year’s surveys to compute the assessment score among professionals who hire new graduates. It also looked at the qualities students and faculty bring to their educational experiences and graduates’ achievements linked to their degrees. What does that mean? If 20 Maurer School of Law graduates received “Super Lawyer” designations and only 5 did from IU- Indy, does that affect the score? I sure hope not. Is it based on how many students from each school are on the partner track? Again, no clue.

Really it boils down to how objective these rankings can be and on that, I’m not sure. The methodology based the rankings on 12 weighted averages of measures of various data. Data typically doesn’t lie, but again, I go back to the “graduates’ achievements linked to their degrees” criteria to question the final results.

Needless to say, some law school deans don’t enjoy this time of year when the rankings come out and even want to do away with them. Students seem to anxiously wait to see where their school ranks, as noted by all talk about the “leaked” results earlier this week.

Let’s hear from you as students or attorneys. How influential were these rankings on where you went to law school? Do you feel pride when your school jumps up in the rankings and anger when it goes down? How much weight should be given to these types of rankings?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. "Am I bugging you? I don't mean to bug ya." If what I wrote below is too much social philosophy for Indiana attorneys, just take ten this vacay to watch The Lego Movie with kiddies and sing along where appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etzMjoH0rJw

  2. I've got some free speech to share here about who is at work via the cat's paw of the ACLU stamping out Christian observances.... 2 Thessalonians chap 2: "And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe. For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last."

  3. Did someone not tell people who have access to the Chevy Volts that it has a gas engine and will run just like a normal car? The batteries give the Volt approximately a 40 mile range, but after that the gas engine will propel the vehicle either directly through the transmission like any other car, or gas engine recharges the batteries depending on the conditions.

  4. Catholic, Lutheran, even the Baptists nuzzling the wolf! http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-hhs-paid-baptist-children-family-services-182129786-four-months-housing-illegal-alien-children/ YET where is the Progressivist outcry? Silent. I wonder why?

  5. Thank you, Honorable Ladies, and thank you, TIL, for this interesting interview. The most interesting question was the last one, which drew the least response. Could it be that NFP stamps are a threat to the very foundation of our common law American legal tradition, a throwback to the continental system that facilitated differing standards of justice? A throwback to Star Chamber’s protection of the landed gentry? If TIL ever again interviews this same panel, I would recommend inviting one known for voicing socio-legal dissent for the masses, maybe Welch, maybe Ogden, maybe our own John Smith? As demographics shift and our social cohesion precipitously drops, a consistent judicial core will become more and more important so that Justice and Equal Protection and Due Process are yet guiding stars. If those stars fall from our collective social horizon (and can they be seen even now through the haze of NFP opinions?) then what glue other than more NFP decisions and TRO’s and executive orders -- all backed by more and more lethally armed praetorians – will prop up our government institutions? And if and when we do arrive at such an end … will any then dare call that tyranny? Or will the cost of such dissent be too high to justify?

ADVERTISEMENT