Finals, and then what?

April 27, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
It’s finals time. Exams have started at two Indiana law schools, with exams beginning next month at the others.

Exams are already stressful enough. Add to that the fact that it seems more students are having trouble finding summer associate positions or jobs for after graduation and this can be a trying time. Some Indiana firms have admitted trimming programs or not hiring students this year because they don’t plan on adding attorneys in the immediate future.

A question for the 3Ls who will be leaving law school in just a few weeks: Are you glad to be done with school or wish you still had another year or two before entering the “real world?” Has the legal world changed at all since you first entered law school?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • The legal landscape has definitely changed since I entered law school 3 years ago. While I am excited about graduating, I would be much more secure if I had a job lined up after graduation. And to make things worse, not only am I competing with the 44,000 law students graduating this year, but I\'m forced to compete with more experienced attorneys who have suffered layoffs due to the economic crisis. While I try to be optimistic and upbeat about my options as I job hunt, I have considered going back to school for an LLM or even an undergrad engineering degree thinking that perhaps I could find a position as a patent attorney...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Family court judges never fail to surprise me with their irrational thinking. First of all any man who abuses his wife is not fit to be a parent. A man who can't control his anger should not be allowed around his child unsupervised period. Just because he's never been convicted of abusing his child doesn't mean he won't and maybe he hasn't but a man that has such poor judgement and control is not fit to parent without oversight - only a moron would think otherwise. Secondly, why should the mother have to pay? He's the one who made the poor decisions to abuse and he should be the one to pay the price - monetarily and otherwise. Yes it's sad that the little girl may be deprived of her father, but really what kind of father is he - the one that abuses her mother the one that can't even step up and do what's necessary on his own instead the abused mother is to pay for him???? What is this Judge thinking? Another example of how this world rewards bad behavior and punishes those who do right. Way to go Judge - NOT.

  2. Right on. Legalize it. We can take billions away from the drug cartels and help reduce violence in central America and more unwanted illegal immigration all in one fell swoop. cut taxes on the savings from needless incarcerations. On and stop eroding our fourth amendment freedom or whatever's left of it.

  3. "...a switch from crop production to hog production "does not constitute a significant change."??? REALLY?!?! Any judge that cannot see a significant difference between a plant and an animal needs to find another line of work.

  4. Why do so many lawyers get away with lying in court, Jamie Yoak?

  5. Future generations will be amazed that we prosecuted people for possessing a harmless plant. The New York Times came out in favor of legalization in Saturday's edition of the newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT