Corruption heads southeast

May 29, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Is Delaware County becoming the new Lake County in terms of political scandals and corruption? There’s a belief (which is sometimes substantiated) that Lake County doesn’t play by the rules when it comes to politics: voting scandals, unethical mayors and elected officials, things of that nature.

Now it appears to be Delaware County’s turn to rival Lake County for corruption issues based on incidents within the last couple of years.

The county had a judge resign from the bench shortly after the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission initiated an investigation of his business interests and judicial obligations. His resignation suspended the investigation. (In an ironic twist, the judge took over the bench in 1998 for another corrupt judge who had resigned after being charged with all sorts of corrupt behavior by the Judicial Qualifications Commission, including a sexual relationship with a client in lieu of monetary payments and that he forged her divorce decree before becoming judge, and that he continued working in private practice after serving as a full-time pro tempore judge.)

Then there’s the hoopla surrounding a lawyer who is a defense attorney and former prosecutor. He faced a charge of conspiracy to commit bribery of a witness in a criminal case. (The lawyer was found not guilty in March.)

The current county prosecutor faces disciplinary charges that he violated four professional conduct rules stemming from his role as a private attorney on civil forfeiture matters related to the criminal defendants he handled as deputy prosecutor on behalf the state. (A special prosecutor recently cleared him of criminal wrongdoing in his handling of the drug forfeiture cases).

There’s been an ongoing battle for Mayor of Muncie – which involves 19 absentee ballots deemed invalid – which the Court of Appeals just ruled on Thursday. (Affirming Sharon McShurley is the mayor.)

And yesterday, a Delaware County grand jury indicted a Muncie City Council member and firefighter on nine Class D felony counts of illegally receiving a ballot.

It used to be that Lake County was named whenever the topic of voter fraud came up, but perhaps people need to start citing Delaware County.

I know corruption can and probably does happen in every county in Indiana, but you have to figure there’s a reason why certain counties gain the reputations they do. Hopefully these are isolated incidents and not a reflection of the state of politics or the legal system in Delaware County.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT