Economy’s effect on diversity

October 7, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
According to the Minority Law Journal’s Minority Experience Study, minorities are feeling the effect of the economy worse than their Caucasian counterparts. The survey asked midlevel associates (third-, fourth-, and fifth-year associates) a series of questions, including whether they were actively seeking other jobs, whether they’d be at their current firm in two years, billable hours, and pay cuts.

According the survey, almost a third of African-American respondents, and nearly a quarter of Hispanic and Asian-American attorneys have high levels of anxiety at their firms about job security. Just over 20 percent of white associates reported high anxiety.

More minorities than whites said their workloads were too light, and minorities posted fewer billable hours than their white counterparts. This was true in last year’s survey, too, but a greater percentage of associates in all ethnic groups said the recession has affected them this year.

According to the survey, it appears black attorneys are having the most trouble with the current economic situation and its impact at firms. African-Americans reported changing practice areas because of the recession the least, were actively looking for another job more than any other group, and were more likely to view the way work is distributed at their firms as less fair than their colleagues.

Billable hours are down for every group, but as usual, the minorities still had fewer hours. You can read more about the survey here.

Also in the article on the study, some feared the economy is pushing firms backward in their diversity efforts and that any strides made over the last few years will be erased. Instead of putting time and resources into recruiting and retaining minority attorneys, firms are trying to find ways to slash costs and focus on keeping the companies profitable.

Are the sentiments the same at Indiana firms? Are minorities more affected and worried about the economy or are all attorneys feeling the same anxiety?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  2. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  3. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

  4. The sad thing is that no fish were thrown overboard The "greenhorn" who had never fished before those 5 days was interrogated for over 4 hours by 5 officers until his statement was illicited, "I don't want to go to prison....." The truth is that these fish were measured frozen off shore and thawed on shore. The FWC (state) officer did not know fish shrink, so the only reason that these fish could be bigger was a swap. There is no difference between a 19 1/2 fish or 19 3/4 fish, short fish is short fish, the ticket was written. In addition the FWC officer testified at trial, he does not measure fish in accordance with federal law. There was a document prepared by the FWC expert that said yes, fish shrink and if these had been measured correctly they averaged over 20 inches (offshore frozen). This was a smoke and mirror prosecution.

  5. I love this, Dave! Many congrats to you! We've come a long way from studying for the bar together! :)

ADVERTISEMENT